Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread John Hasler
Andreas Leitner writes: > Even if you have several partitions, a root process should be able to > access all of them. So there should be no difference if you have only one > partition or several. It is very unlikely that a runaway process, root or not, would be writing to more than one partition.

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Aurelio Turco wrote: > 1: A runaway root process fills up the disk. > (Will I not be able to get in as root and > kill the offending process?) Not always. It could be absorbing vast amounts of processor power as well. > 2: The filesystem becomes damaged. >

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread dman
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:38:50AM +1300, Adam Warner wrote: | On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 01:16, Andreas Leitner wrote: | | > Yep, the idea is good. But in practice how much space do you give /home | > ? I hate it when I ran out of disk space, even though there would be | > plenty. | | The question is

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Mark Carroll
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Aurelio Turco wrote: > If I install Debian on a single partition, That's the usual case on my personal system, although I don't generally recommend the practice. > what is the worst that can happen, > in the following two cases (the two most > cited justifications for having

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Adam Warner
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 01:16, Andreas Leitner wrote: > Yep, the idea is good. But in practice how much space do you give /home > ? I hate it when I ran out of disk space, even though there would be > plenty. The question is how much do you give the operating system :-) Everything else is /home. S

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Andreas Leitner
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 14:03, Adam Warner wrote: > I like to have two partitions: one for my data (/home) and one for > everything else (and a third for the swap file, and a physically > different hard disks for backups). Such a small number of partitions > might make me a heretic :-) > > There are

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Adam Warner
I like to have two partitions: one for my data (/home) and one for everything else (and a third for the swap file, and a physically different hard disks for backups). Such a small number of partitions might make me a heretic :-) There are clear advantages to this setup: 1. I can backup/restore th

Re: single partition worst-case scenarios

2001-10-23 Thread Andreas Leitner
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 12:28, Aurelio Turco wrote: > > If I install Debian on a single partition, > what is the worst that can happen, > in the following two cases (the two most > cited justifications for having multiple > partitions): > > 1: A runaway root process fills up the disk. > (Wi