Re: simple, dumb question

2014-11-20 Thread koanhead
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:00:03 +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 19 nov 14, 21:25:52, koanhead wrote: >> I have had to >> pin the systemd package -1 to prevent it being reinstalled on upgrades >> or on dist-upgrades... > > Please do report bugs if apt-get still tries to replace sysvinit-core >

Re: simple, dumb question

2014-11-19 Thread John Hasler
Andrei POPESCU writes: > This should already be fixed in unstable, by switching around the > Depends of libpam-systemd to systemd-shim | systemd-sysv. It is. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: simple, dumb question

2014-11-19 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 19 nov 14, 21:25:52, koanhead wrote: > > Yes (and no). I am writing this from a Jessie box running sysvinit + > OpenRC. AIUI you won't actually have to remove any packages to use > sysvinit, just install sysvinit-core and systemd-shim. I have had to pin > the systemd package -1 to preven

Re: simple, dumb question

2014-11-19 Thread koanhead
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:10:04 +0100, Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > just a simple question. No flamewar, no weighting! At the moment I am > running debian/jessie with systemd. And at the moment I am happy with > it. Good! > > It is nopt quite clear for me, but is the next debian/stable release >

Re: simple, dumb question

2014-11-19 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 19.11.2014 um 22:09 schrieb Hans: > just a simple question. No flamewar, no weighting! At the moment I am > running > debian/jessie with systemd. And at the moment I am happy with it. > > It is nopt quite clear for me, but is the next debian/stable release planned > in that way, that it wi