On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:21:16AM +0200, Nicolas Kratz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:20:57PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> > Since X works on clean installations, I'm pretty sure deleting/moving
> > out of the way /etc/.X* would fix this.
>
> My wa would be greatly disturbed if there were .X* fi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:20:57PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> Since X works on clean installations, I'm pretty sure deleting/moving
> out of the way /etc/.X* would fix this.
My wa would be greatly disturbed if there were .X* files in my /etc. ;-)
Cheers,
Nick
--
x-
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:03:26AM +0200, Nicolas Kratz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:34:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Up-to-date sid installation w/ working X:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ll /tmp/.X11-unix/ -a
> > > total 16
> > > drwxrwxrwt2 root root 4
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:34:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Up-to-date sid installation w/ working X:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ll /tmp/.X11-unix/ -a
> > total 16
> > drwxrwxrwt2 root root 4096 Mar 24 03:19 .
> > drwxrwxrwt9 root root12288 Mar 30 2
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:46:58PM +0200, Nicolas Kratz happened to mention:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:23:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "X: /tmp/.X11-unix has suspicious ownership (not root:root), aborting."
> >
> > dang, I thought. So I do my googling, and found some others have
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:23:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "X: /tmp/.X11-unix has suspicious ownership (not root:root), aborting."
>
> dang, I thought. So I do my googling, and found some others have asked
> this question with the response of basically "well, do what it says and
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
