Re: Samba server doesn't ask for alternate user credentials...

2022-10-25 Thread nimrod
Dear David, below is what you asked for, I hope it's enough, thanks. On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 17:26 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 10/21/22 05:40, nimrod wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running a Debian 10 Samba server with winbind and kerberos in a > > Active Directory domain. > > > > Domain use

Re: Samba server doesn't ask for alternate user credentials...

2022-10-21 Thread David Christensen
On 10/21/22 05:40, nimrod wrote: Hi, I'm running a Debian 10 Samba server with winbind and kerberos in a Active Directory domain. Domain users can access a unique share, which is then divideded into different directories, each with different file system permissions, based on domain users and gr

Re: Samba server stop working after upgrade

2010-02-01 Thread Marc Olive
We solved it, was not about the upgrade, this was just a coincidence. Was another machine that was acting as local master browser. Sorry for the noise -- Marc Olivé Grup Blau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l

Re: samba server

2005-05-18 Thread chuchyyy
Hi and thx for ur response, i changed the name of my admin in all configurations files. I referred him to as root. I added root as a pozixAccount. Here is my result : sambaLMPassword F0D412BD764FFE81AAD3B435B51404EE sambaPrimaryGroupSIDS-1-5-21-634357371-4061345844-4009714039-513 displayName

Re: samba server

2005-05-18 Thread Mark Roach
chuchyyy wrote: is there a relation between my problem and a configuration of common-auth in /etc/pam.d/, or common-passwd? Cause i did all advices that u told me but it doesnt work... Nope. PAM is for authentication. NSS is like DNS for user IDs On 5/17/05, chuchyyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: here

Re: samba server

2005-05-18 Thread chuchyyy
is there a relation between my problem and a configuration of common-auth in /etc/pam.d/, or common-passwd? Cause i did all advices that u told me but it doesnt work... Thank you, Guillaume On 5/17/05, chuchyyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > here is my ldif file : > > dn: cn=admin,dc=netc,dc=net

Re: samba server

2005-05-17 Thread chuchyyy
here is my ldif file : dn: cn=admin,dc=netc,dc=net objectclass: sambaSamAccount cn: admin o: netc uid : 0 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sn: Administrateur then ldapadd. "id admin" doesnt seem to work... My computer is in my LDAP yet. all permissions are good. Even more than 644... thx for your patienc

Re: samba server

2005-05-17 Thread Mark Roach
chuchyyy wrote: Hi Mark, thx for your response ! I tried id admin : no such user like u said. I had already install libnss-ldap, but i had "files ldap" for passwd and group. but id admin still doesnt work. "id root" says: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) But the LDAP administrator is "admi

Re: samba server

2005-05-17 Thread chuchyyy
Hi Mark, thx for your response ! I tried id admin : no such user like u said. I had already install libnss-ldap, but i had "files ldap" for passwd and group. but id admin still doesnt work. "id root" says: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) But the LDAP administrator is "admin" not "root" .

Re: samba server

2005-05-17 Thread Mark Roach
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:26 -0400, chuchyyy wrote: > i ve got a problem. Im running open LDAP with samba server. I have an > LDAPadministrator which is referred to as "admin". > i added my computer windows 2K to LDAP with "smbldap-useradd -w" from > smbldap-tools. > Now i can't join the samba serv

Re: SAMBA SERVER + WINDOWS 200

2000-09-24 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > I have configured my Samba Server and all PCs in diferent NT domains are > able to access my Samba Server. > The only computers that cannot access the Samba Server are those with > Windows 2

Re: Samba server connection from NT WS4 without password + MC only runs as root?

2000-02-10 Thread aphro
i assume not all users have the same password? turn up the logging level in samba to level 3 and see whats going on. also it may be worth while going to samba 3.0 ive had much better results using 3.0 then 2.0 (3.0 is alpha) nate On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kubics > kubics > k