Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-06 Thread Helios de Creisquer
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:42:15AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:21:31PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:08:13PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > > This isn't true. APT's HTTP method has always used the HTTP/1.1 Range: > > > header to attempt to resum

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:21:31PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:08:13PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > This isn't true. APT's HTTP method has always used the HTTP/1.1 Range: > > header to attempt to resume downloads from the middle of a file. The > > only reason it might no

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:08:13PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I don't know about the masquerading part but apt-get can certainly > > > resume an interupted download using HTTP. > > > > Resume in 2 sense: > > APT ... > > This isn't true. APT's HTTP method has always used the HTTP/1.1 Range:

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:30:38PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:07:27AM +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > FTP can resume partialy downloaded file transfer. > > > > > > HTTP can not resume partialy downloaded fi

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:24:16AM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Or run from root: > > # apt-setup >I'm afraid that /etc/apt/sources.list has mostly ftp entries, and > apt-get output indicates that these are the ones actually

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2002-01-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:07:27AM +, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Which file transfer mode did you use and are you using? > > FTP vs. HTTP > > > > FTP can resume partialy downloaded file transfer. > > > > HTTP can not resume partialy

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2001-12-31 Thread Brian Potkin
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: > >I've noticed that apt-get doesn't anymore resume a partially > > downloaded package, it prefers to fetch the whole one. Any hints? > > > >BTW I'm running an

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2001-12-31 Thread Brian Potkin
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:24:16AM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: >I'm afraid that /etc/apt/sources.list has mostly ftp entries, and > apt-get output indicates that these are the ones actually being used. > I haven't found any of the keywords ``resume'' or ``partial'' neither > in the releva

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2001-12-31 Thread Serafim Zanikolas
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: > >I've noticed that apt-get doesn't anymore resume a partially > FTP can resume partially downloaded file transfer. > > HTTP can not resume partially downloaded fil

Re: resuming apt-get downloads

2001-12-31 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: >I've noticed that apt-get doesn't anymore resume a partially > downloaded package, it prefers to fetch the whole one. Any hints? > >BTW I'm running an up-to-date testing system with apt 0.5.4 Which file transfer mode did