On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:16:15 +1000, Mark Huff wrote:
> Well, I did some further testing and checking and here is what I come to
> find out. Debian 2.2 shipped with perl5.004 while Debian 3.0 shipped
> with perl 5.6.1. From what I can find out, perl5.004 is in no way
> compatible with 5.6.1, a
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:53:08PM +1000, Mark Huff wrote:
> I am having a problem with a user and would like some clarification if I
> did correct or incorrectly. Honest answers appreciated.
>
> I performed some work for a company on a Debian Linux system with the
> prompt on the syst
Well, I did some further testing and checking and here is what I come to
find out. Debian 2.2 shipped with perl5.004 while Debian 3.0 shipped
with perl 5.6.1. From what I can find out, perl5.004 is in no way
compatible with 5.6.1, and because of the path differences, module
differences, etc,
Mark Huff wrote:
> I performed some work for a company on a Debian Linux system with the
> prompt on the system (no graphic frontends, etc) indicated it was a
> Debian 3.0 (Woody) built. The initial issue was a user outside of the
> company could not get an email sent to a user on the company's
>
Omar Shuja Siddiqui wrote:
>
> hi
> im omar shuja a linux fan.
> i have a very old IBM 86 processor on which i want to
> install linux.
Please be more specific about processors: do you mean
an 8088 or 80286? If so, no. There is a project going
to port a version of Linux to '286s, but it's not
5 matches
Mail list logo
