On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:53:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:02:34PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:31:21AM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> > > Thanks for the response Kevin. I appreciate you taking the time to answer
> > > my
> > > qu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This whole libc6 problem puzzles me. I thought that Linux libraries
were version-numbered in such a way that the linker could distinguish
compatible from incompatible versions. Why does this mechanism not work
for libc6?
-- hendrik
I don't know the answer to y
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:02:34PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:31:21AM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> > Thanks for the response Kevin. I appreciate you taking the time to answer my
> > question.
> >
> > I was afraid that Apt was going to remove the packages because of
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:31:21AM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> Thanks for the response Kevin. I appreciate you taking the time to answer my
> question.
>
> I was afraid that Apt was going to remove the packages because of a
> dependency. I figured libc6 and glib were important libraries, as
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:56:38PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:22:04PM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> > I am trying to install Mono on my Debian System. I went to backports.org and
> > downloaded the Mono packages for Sarge, the version of Debian I am running.
> > When
Thanks for the response Kevin. I appreciate you taking the time to answer my question.
I was afraid that Apt was going to remove the packages because of a dependency. I figured libc6 and glib were important libraries, as Apt said it was going to remove 145 packages if I installed the new version
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:22:04PM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> I am trying to install Mono on my Debian System. I went to backports.org and
> downloaded the Mono packages for Sarge, the version of Debian I am running.
> When I tried to install Mono apt told me that I needed a more recent ver
Subject: removing packages
Date: Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 04:12:33PM -0500
In reply to:Brian Smith
Quoting Brian Smith([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I mistakenly told the potatoe install routine to install everything on
> the 3 cd's I have, and I ran out of disk space (only have 1Gb). I wan
Is that correct? I just re-re-re-re-looked at man apt-get and found this:
--purge
Use purge instead of remove for anything that would
be removed. Configuration Item: APT::Get::Purge.
tatah
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 16:51, will trillich wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 04:12:33PM -0500, Brian Smith wrote:
> I mistakenly told the potatoe install routine to install everything on
> the 3 cd's I have, and I ran out of disk space (only have 1Gb). I want
> to remove packages, do I use apt-remove or something like that ? I tried
> that and got a
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 03:14:07AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> none (afaik), except that pre-invoke and post-invoke commands in
> /etc/apt/apt.conf are run when you use apt.
>
> this is useful if you keep /usr mounted readonly and have pre/post
> invoke commands to mount it read-write when nee
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 12:09:41PM +0200, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Does someone know the difference between removing a package with
> dpkg and apt-get?
none (afaik), except that pre-invoke and post-invoke commands in
/etc/apt/apt.conf are run when you use apt.
this is useful if you keep /usr moun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Vitor Beires Nogueira wrote:
> dpkg --purge --force-depends babel latex
>
> I get these errors:
>
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/latex.prerm: install-fmt-base: command not found
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/babel.postrm: install-fmt-base: command not fou
13 matches
Mail list logo
