On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Anthony Mapes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good
> and bad to include in signatures?
Very amusing! You've made my day. :)
> - --
> Anthony Mapes
> -
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:38:28 -0500, Anthony Mapes
wrote:
> (Are there email clients out there that don't display who the sender
> was?)
If such a mail client exists, its users should not be forgiven.
On Thu, Dec 24 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>> [snipped 32 lines]
>
> This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that
> you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good
and bad to include in signatures? I've seen a lot of conflicting
opinions online, particularly surrounding whether or not to include your
email address. (Are there email client
On 2015-12-24 at 07:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
>
> [snipped 32 lines]
This is standard practice; you don't usually need to indicate that
you've snipped at all (except maybe by leaving a blank line in between
the quoted bits where the snip was), much
On Wed, Dec 23 2015,The Wanderer wrote:
[snipped 32 lines]
>> Minor note: I do not recall seeing signatures like yours.
>
> The standard for signature delimiters is a line consisting of '-- ', as
> the first line of the signature block. Software which knows what it's
> doing will see this line
On Wed, Dec 23 2015,Udyant Wig wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 12:15 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>>
>> I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
>> entire texdoc package got installed too. that is humoungous and I'd
>> like to remove the doc packages alone and also stop future in
The aptitude command line I suggested removed such documentation packages as
texlive-fonts-extra-doc
texlive-fonts-recommended-doc
texlive-latex-extra-doc
apart from the science, pstricks, and pictures doc packages. The language
docs had to be handled specially because of the transiti
On 2015-12-23 at 16:48, Doug wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 01:45 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>
>> I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
>> entire texdoc package got installed too. that is humoungous and
>> I'd like to remove the doc packages alone and also stop future
>> i
On 12/23/2015 01:45 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
entire texdoc package got installed too. that is humoungous and I'd
like to remove the doc packages alone and also stop future installs
of the same type whenever I Upgrade TexLiv
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:27:25AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-12-23 at 09:55, Udyant Wig wrote:
>
> > On 12/23/2015 12:15 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
> >
> >> I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
> >> entire texdoc package got installed too. that is
Hi,
This fixes error in my previous post.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:27:25AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2015-12-23 at 09:55, Udyant Wig wrote:
> > # To prevent these packages from getting installed later:
...
> If that's been changed, or if there's a mechanism which avoids it and
> does wo
On 2015-12-23 at 09:55, Udyant Wig wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 12:15 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>
>> I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
>> entire texdoc package got installed too. that is humoungous and
>> I'd like to remove the doc packages alone and also stop futu
On 12/23/2015 12:15 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
>
> I installed TexLive recently and during one of the upgrades, the
> entire texdoc package got installed too. that is humoungous and I'd
> like to remove the doc packages alone and also stop future installs of
> the same type whenever I Upgrade
14 matches
Mail list logo
