Hi,
* Paul Johnson wrote (2004-02-07 04:55):
>On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:07:47PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>> % * David T-G wrote (2004-02-07 00:03):
>> % >Basically, any affirming superlative describes mutt accurately and well.
>> %
>> % Your $indent_string still sucks, but this is now sigged.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:07:47PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % * David T-G wrote (2004-02-07 00:03):
> % >Basically, any affirming superlative describes mutt accurately and well.
> %
> % Your $indent_string still sucks, but this is now sigged.
>
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hi!
%
% * David T-G wrote (2004-02-07 00:03):
% >Basically, any affirming superlative describes mutt accurately and well.
%
% Your $indent_string still sucks, but this is now sigged.
Nice to hear from you, too :-) Glad you liked
Hi,
* David T-G wrote (2004-02-07 00:03):
>Basically, any affirming superlative describes mutt accurately and well.
Your $indent_string still sucks, but this is now sigged.
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10,
Johann, et al --
...and then Johann Koenig said...
%
% On Friday February 6 at 06:39am
% Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
%
% > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
%
% This has been bothering me for a while. I thought Mutt was good because
Yep. It's da bomb. It's phat. It rulez.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:12:44PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> >
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:48:46PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:41:52PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > But you don't get the digest version, do you?
>
> Nope. Never saw the point, since it's easier to deal with each
> message individually.
True, so I burst the digests and re
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from the messages contained in them. The
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:41:52PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> But you don't get the digest version, do you?
Nope. Never saw the point, since it's easier to deal with each
message individually.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:41:56PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> >
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:44:32PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:30:11PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Thanks for the correction... but the In-Reply-To: headers have gone missing
> > too, from the same date. Before Nov 21, bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:30:11PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Thanks for the correction... but the In-Reply-To: headers have gone missing
> too, from the same date. Before Nov 21, both sets of headers were present in
> the digest messages; after then, neit
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from the messages contained in them. The
>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:26:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> > missing the R
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:26:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> > missing the R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm at my wit's end here. I have a 'testing' system that's got an
> Ensoniq 1371 sound card in it. I recompiled the kernel after I got the
> card, and sound in general (xmms, sound effects in Doom, etc.) has been
> working fine for months. H
nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ive had 1370 and 1371 cards for a little over a year and love them..
I just picked up a cheap es1373 and was absolutely delighted to find
it has s/pdif out! Great card.
As for the original question, ISTR there's some way to get timidity to
work as /dev/sequenc
> I'm at my wit's end here. I have a 'testing' system that's got an
> Ensoniq 1371 sound card in it. I recompiled the kernel after I got
> the card, and sound in general (xmms, sound effects in Doom, etc.)
> has been working fine for months. However, /dev/sequencer doesn't
> seem to work.
>
a
On Sat, 07 Jul 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
>I'd like to make references in some changelog to a message in debian
> mailing list archives.
[...]
>Can I put this as reference?
>How can I get the message in the archive with this reference?
Go to http://lists.debian.org, find the me
20 matches
Mail list logo
