> The quality of the encoder -engines- are in order:
>
> Fraunhoffer (spelling correct?)
> Xing
> ISO
Really? Dit you really try the ISO encoding model?
> However, the quality differences are only noticeable
> by -very- high trained professionals or with oscilloscopes.
To my grandmother, maybe.
Go here:
ftp://geek.rcc.se/pub/mp3encoder/lame/
Grab the latest one (3.51 as of 11/24/99).
Untar-unzip the .tar.gz file
cd lame3.51
make
(as root) make install
You may need to edit the Makefile, but I did not on my system.
Sean
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> Dumb question - could anyone giv
Dumb question - could anyone give me an "idiots walk-through" of
installing LAME? It's probably somewhere simple, but all the stuff about
"LAME won't even compile by itself" on the web page put me off. And of
course there's no package for it...
Thanks very much in advance,
Stuart.
Sean Johnson wr
ybe because of BladeEnc).
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Stephan Hachinger
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:55 PM
> Subject: Re: recommend mp3 enco
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: recommend mp3 encoder
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Thomas Keusch wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genki
--- Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> >
> > About the only choice these days is bladeenc. Due
> to
> > patent issues it is probably NOT available in a
> .deb,
> > at least not on the debian ftp site. However you
> can
> > get it from Tord's home page (I don't
Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
> About the only choice these days is bladeenc. Due to
> patent issues it is probably NOT available in a .deb,
> at least not on the debian ftp site. However you can
> get it from Tord's home page (I don't recall the url,
> but you can find it on freshmeat or linuxberg).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Thomas Keusch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
> > about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 07:56:03AM -0800, aphro wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Onno wrote:
>
> ebbin2 >However, the quality differences are only noticeable
> ebbin2 >by -very- high trained professionals or with oscilloscopes.
>
> i cant tell the diff between 96kbps (what i use on my rio) and 128kb
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
> about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable
> to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux?
>
> I'll be encoding wavs into 256 KBps
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Onno wrote:
ebbin2 >However, the quality differences are only noticeable
ebbin2 >by -very- high trained professionals or with oscilloscopes.
i cant tell the diff between 96kbps (what i use on my rio) and 128kbps (on
my pc) ! doh! heheh
nate
-
The quality of the encoder -engines- are in order:
Fraunhoffer (spelling correct?)
Xing
ISO
However, the quality differences are only noticeable
by -very- high trained professionals or with oscilloscopes.
Regards,
Onno
At 03:55 PM 11/20/99 -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
Hi all:
I'm looking fo
> As Remco & Nathan already told you, BladeEncoder is very good:
> it sticks closely to the ISO standard, contrary to Frauenhoffer,
> which is a bit better in low streams, but not very good in hi streams.
Well,
To use a really free MP3 encoder is impossible, so
LAME (www.sulaco.org/lame) is bett
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 10:23:45AM -0800, wrote:
> About the only choice these days is bladeenc. Due to
> patent issues it is probably NOT available in a .deb,
> at least not on the debian ftp site. However you can
> get it from Tord's home page (I don't recall the url,
> but you can find it on
* Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
> about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable
> to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux?
LAME is said to be the best-quality free encoder.
http:/
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
> about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable
> to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux?
>
> I'll be encoding wavs i
On 20 Nov 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
: Hi all:
:
: I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care
: about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable
: to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux?
:
: I'll be encoding wavs into 256 KBps mp3's
GOGO: http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~shigeo/gogo_e.html
BladeEnc: http://hem.bredband.net/tord/
encode: ftp://wopr.campus.luth.se/pub/mpeg_layer_3/
I am sure BladeEnc can do it.
HTH,
Remco
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 15:55, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm looking for the highest compress
18 matches
Mail list logo
