Re: rcs file

2007-03-19 Thread Ken Irving
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:57:59PM -0400, Tony Heal wrote: > I am trying to initialize and update an rcs file manually. Here is what I am > trying to do. > > Debian woody > rcs v 5.7-13 > TWiki - 24 Nov 2001 > > I am using the xconf plugin to parse an xconf file. This works fine. > > I want to

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-12-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2004-11-29 05:08:19 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > Arch is especially nice because you don't need a server process > anywhere, like Subversion does, but it supports changesets, like > Subversion does. Subversion doesn't need a server process (unless you want a server): The svn client can access fi

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-30 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Colin wrote: I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet. It has been mentioned several times Regards, Benedict -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-30 Thread Colin
I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:52:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote: > Not sure about that, actually, but integration with my favorite editor > (vim) would be nice. CVS, Subversion, and the venerable RCS/SCCS itelf all have available vim integration tools. I don't know if Arch does... I haven't been able

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:28:17 +0100, Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch, > Subversion ... > > Thanks for your experiences Set aside some time to test them all. It isn't easy to test them, you have to try a number of thing whi

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Allan Wind
On 2004-11-29T17:53:07+0100, Mateusz Åoskot wrote: > Sorry, I can't help you. Looking on your toughts about all those > RCSs I can say you have a big problem to find the one ;-) One requirement for me to open ended support for files other than line based text files. It should support merging of x

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
Allan Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > cvs is the most gorilla of the 3 and it shows especially when it comes > to audit and monitoring (syntax for branching and mergeing seemed > unnatural to me). > > [...] > > I cannot for the life of me get used to the odly named file names or > namespace in

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Allan Wind
I just evaluated prcs, cvs and monotone for a paper, representing somewhat the single-user scenario, client-server and peer-to-peer. prcs can be used in a client-server setting too, but requires you to share disks, but has otherwise a really clean interface Not widely used, as far as I know. cvs

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
User Richard Kemp wrote:: Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch, Subversion ... Thanks for your experiences My favourites (in order): - subversion - darcs - cvs Here is a very nice comparsion which should help you to make a decision. Greets -- Mateusz Łoskot, mateusz (

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:28:17PM +0100, Richard Kemp wrote: > Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch, > Subversion ... I don't know about "best", but so far I like arch, although it is a little bit "opaque" regarding usage. Arch is especially nice because you don't n

Re: RCS (Revision Control System)

2004-11-29 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-29 13:28]: > > Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch, > Subversion ... > This depends on your requirements. I know CVS, arch and Subversion. CVS I would not recommend anymore. arch is really cool -- but not too easy. Subvers

Re: rcs help

2003-12-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:41:02PM -0800, Gruessle wrote: > > > I been trying my self on RCS > I read the "man rcs" file > created an rcs file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian > box > But I can't figure how this is supposed to work. > Isn't there a way to opening the file and ed

Re: rcs help

2003-12-17 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 at 21:41 GMT, Gruessle penned: > > > I been trying my self on RCS I read the "man rcs" file created an rcs > file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian box But I > can't figure how this is supposed to work. Isn't there a way to > opening the file and editing it?

Re: rcs help

2003-12-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:41:02PM -0800, Gruessle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I been trying my self on RCS > I read the "man rcs" file > created an rcs file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian > box > But I can't figure how this is supposed to work. > Isn't there a way to ope

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-14 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:27:43AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > > What indication do you have that ntpdate is not running? Maybe you could > add a line: > touch /home/user/ntpdateisworking > to the script. Reboot, if the file exists, ntpdate ran. > > If your date is off, try checking your timezo

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-14 Thread Kevin McKinley
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200 Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate > script doesn't get run. > > Even though there is a symlink to it in the rcS.d directory. > > Where can I see that the rcS.d directory gets called? S

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-14 Thread Johann Koenig
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200 Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate > script doesn't get run. > > Even though there is a symlink to it in the rcS.d directory. > > Where can I see that the rcS.d directory gets c

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-14 Thread Johann Koenig
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:29:59 +0200 Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:27:43AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > > > > What indication do you have that ntpdate is not running? Maybe you > > could add a line: > > touch /home/user/ntpdateisworking > > to the script. Reb

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-14 Thread Johann Koenig
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:16:21 +0200 Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200 > > Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the

Re: rcS directory

2003-08-11 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200 > Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate > > script doesn't get run. > > > > Even though there is a symlink t

Re: rcS

2002-02-27 Thread Tom Cook
Ren Weili wrote: > > hallo, > I can not understand line 41 in /etc/init.d/rcS: > > [ ! -f "$i" ] && continue > > all files under /etc/rcS.d are symbolinks. > and [ ! -f "$i" ] equals false. > > so is this line yet necessary here ? > The comment

Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
* xio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.12 11:47:00+]: > 2. CVS is more difficult to setup and does not work out of the box for > /etc. > > a. you have to first import the whole /etc tree to cvs > b. symbolic links will be ignored. > c. automated changes will be de

Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-13 Thread xio
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Andras BALI wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote: > > > I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. > > Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it > on your own. I use it for all my i

Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-12 Thread Andras BALI
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote: > I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it on your own. I use it for all my important config files and it's really great. Regards, -- BALI, Andra's

Re: rcS error on bootup --potato

2000-02-07 Thread Martin Fluch
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Griim wrote: > Hi, > I'm running potato, and on a vanilla install of it, I get the > following error message: > > /etc/init.d/rcS: /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: > unexpected end of file Known bug (typo) in libc6 package ... Martin --- devpts.sh.orig

Re: rcS error on bootup --potato

2000-02-07 Thread Gregory T. Norris
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 03:59:53PM -0500, Griim wrote: > Hi, > I'm running potato, and on a vanilla install of it, I get the > following error message: > > /etc/init.d/rcS: /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: > unexpected end of file > > Anyone else have this problem, or know wha

Re: RCS documentation

1999-06-18 Thread Jean-Philippe Guérard
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Urban Gabor wrote: > I'm writing an RCS tutorial in Hungarian and I would like to read a > somewhat official RCS documentiation. Any texinfo, latex or similar link > should be wellcome. I believe the first place to look at is : man rcsintro Hope it helps

Re: RCS & CVS

1998-08-12 Thread joost
On 12 Aug 1998, Deniz Dogan wrote: > Currently I`m using RCS with single files (some configuration > files). And I need CVS to access to a CVS server. Can I purge RCS and > install CVS and use instead of RCS? Or, do I have to use both of them > to work with the files under RCS? In this case, yo