Envoyé depuis un mobile SamsungStan Hoeppner a écrit
:On 12/7/2012 5:48 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> A RAID-1 will outperform
> a parity-based RAID using the same disks every time, due to calculating the
> parity.
This hasn't been true for almost a decade. Even the slowest of modern
single c
On 12/7/2012 5:48 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> A RAID-1 will outperform
> a parity-based RAID using the same disks every time, due to calculating the
> parity.
This hasn't been true for almost a decade. Even the slowest of modern
single core x86 CPUs have plenty of excess horsepower for soft RAID
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:18:38PM -0300, Roberto Scattini wrote:
> hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks.
> his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is
> really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time).
>
> which raid configuration would you re
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Roberto Scattini:
> hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks.
> his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is
> really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time).
>
> which raid configuration would you recommend?
On 06/12/12 13:18, Roberto Scattini wrote:
hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks.
his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is
really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time).
which raid configuration would you recommend?
i was thinking in ra
Hello,
for databases its recommended to use raid10, cause of the speed
regards
Stefan
Le 15680ième jour après Epoch,
Roberto Scattini écrivait:
> hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks.
> his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is
> really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time).
>
> which raid configuration would you recommend?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Roberto Scattini wrote:
> hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks.
> his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is
> really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time).
>
> which raid configuration would you recommend?
8 matches
Mail list logo