On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:25:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Oh, I should have mentioned that the switches I use are 10/100 megabit, not
> gigabit.
>
> (I'm not sure, but the switch built into my Edge Router might be Gigabit,
> but that device was closer to $50 (on sale, I'm fairly sure, a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:18:23AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe, but I've bought things that I think are (5-port) switches (advertised
as such) for in the range of $10 in various sales or on ebay, and so far, have
no reason to doubt them.
I guess I'll have to really test in the near fu
Michael Stone writes:
> There's more debugging that could be done if needed, but for .01% I'd
> write it off as a momentary blip, maybe related to load during startup
> of a network service, and ignore it unless it started growing.
Yeah, currently I'm working as a monitoring specialist and after
Oh, I should have mentioned that the switches I use are 10/100 megabit, not
gigabit.
(I'm not sure, but the switch built into my Edge Router might be Gigabit, but
that device was closer to $50 (on sale, I'm fairly sure, although I bought it
at a time when I was having problems with my LAN, so
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 06:00:01 AM Peter Wiersig wrote:
> mick crane writes:
> > It's got "8 port switch" printed on it but if there is network activity
> > all the lights seem to flash.
>
> Ok, that simple you can't distinguish between hubs and switches:
> If you connect a new device to yo
mick crane writes:
> Just looking I had a misspelled entry in hosts file on windows for the
> PC that is name server which can't have been helping matters.
No, but problems that arise from that manifest in different ways
contrary to what you posted in the initial mail.
> I'll get some decent c
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Peter Wiersig wrote:
I strive for local networks that would have single digit drops in 47m
packets and I'm willing to spend the money for the equipment to achieve
that. My quoted ifconfig output comes from a rented server in some
datacenter where I don't
On 2019-04-10 14:01, Peter Wiersig wrote:
Michael Stone writes:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:00:01PM +0200, Peter Wiersig wrote:
/sbin/ifconfig
enp0s25: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255
inet6 fe80::219:d1ff:fe41:c769 prefixlen 64
Michael Stone writes:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:00:01PM +0200, Peter Wiersig wrote:
>>> /sbin/ifconfig
>>> enp0s25: flags=4163 mtu 1500
>>> inet 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255
>>> inet6 fe80::219:d1ff:fe41:c769 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20
>>>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:00:01PM +0200, Peter Wiersig wrote:
/sbin/ifconfig
enp0s25: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255
inet6 fe80::219:d1ff:fe41:c769 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20
ether 00:19:d1:41:c7:69 txqueuelen 1000 (E
mick crane writes:
> On 2019-04-09 07:46, Peter Wiersig wrote:
>>
>> Is anything else connected to this hub? If your problems occur, is
>> anything else using the hub concurrently? Can you reduce the
>> connections only to server and client and maybe a internet uplink?
>> Network printers can d
On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:46:07 +0200
Peter Wiersig wrote:
...
> For reference, here's my output:
>
> eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
> inet 217.172.177.159 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 217.172.177.255
> ether 00:19:66:f1:43:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
> RX packets 8199
mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-04-09 07:46, Peter Wiersig wrote:
> > mick crane writes:
> > >
> > > the PCs are physically adjacent connected with the RJ45 ( isn't it )
> > > cables through what is supposed to be a switch I got in B&Q several
> > > years ago.
> >
> i
> how do I tell if it's a swit
On 2019-04-09 07:46, Peter Wiersig wrote:
mick crane writes:
the PCs are physically adjacent connected with the RJ45 ( isn't it )
cables through what is supposed to be a switch I got in B&Q several
years ago.
Almost, RJ-45 is the specification for the plug and jacks, what you're
having here
mick crane writes:
>
> the PCs are physically adjacent connected with the RJ45 ( isn't it )
> cables through what is supposed to be a switch I got in B&Q several
> years ago.
Almost, RJ-45 is the specification for the plug and jacks, what you're
having here is ethernet wiring in twisted pairs be
Hey Mick,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:31:26PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2019-04-08 23:03, l...@levlaz.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:38:48PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
This is probably something to do with the network connection.
Any idea to find out what might cause this sluggardly beh
On 2019-04-08 23:03, l...@levlaz.org wrote:
Hey Mick,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:38:48PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
hello,
It may not be mail list specific but maybe somebody knows ?
If I connect windows 10 to debian Buster with putty and edit a file.
Usually the little cursor beetles across the
Hey Mick,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:38:48PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
hello,
It may not be mail list specific but maybe somebody knows ?
If I connect windows 10 to debian Buster with putty and edit a file.
Usually the little cursor beetles across the screen over the characters
but then sometime
You'd at least have to explain the type of connection from the putty
client to the server. But your symptoms don't ring a bell over here
aside from a saturated uplink.
Peter
19 matches
Mail list logo
