On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:48:11 +0100, Brian wrote:
(...)
> ATAs may be standards compliant but they are not exactly open. Given
> that, they can be far more convenient to use in a static situation.
Is there any "old-fashioned" (aka, PSTN/ISDN or hybrids) PBX that is
"open"? (no, Asterik does not
Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 14/06/11 04:58, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:33:41 +0100, Brian wrote:
>>> On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 14:24:54 +, Camaleón wrote:
For those -friends, family, skype-friendly, etc...- I just simply use
the low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider h
On Tue 14 Jun 2011 at 11:40:49 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I use VoIP with Ekiga by means of USB headset (from Plantronics) and
> works like a charm. I'm so happy with it that I'm thinking in acquiring
> an ATA converter so I can use any standard phone with it and make VoIP my
> default calling sy
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:37 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:24, Camaleón wrote:
>> low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has
>
> How's the sound quality?
With "standard" DSL (10 Mbps/1 Mbps) is very good (sometimes even better
that when I use my cell phone). Wit
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:28:52 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:34, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>
> [...]and ISPs start rolling out VOIP products of their own. [...]
>
> Will ISPs start blocking VoIP ports? *evil grin*
(...)
Our ISP carrier (Telefonica) recently installed F
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:34, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
[...]and ISPs start rolling out VOIP products of their own. [...]
Will ISPs start blocking VoIP ports? *evil grin*
> with the telcos. I heard of one that is basically a wireless PSTN
> equivalent - no line rental, a landline number, data rate
Hi,
Scott Ferguson wrote:
Both Virgin and Vodaphone
have portable wireless products being tested that will compete directly
with the telcos. I heard of one that is basically a wireless PSTN
equivalent - no line rental, a landline number, data rates, and analogue
connection plugs. Essentiall
On 14/06/11 04:58, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:33:41 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
>> On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 14:24:54 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> For those -friends, family, skype-friendly, etc...- I just simply use
>>> the low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has and place them a
>>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:24, Camaleón wrote:
> low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has
How's the sound quality?
Any big known SIP providers?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 18:58:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Here (Spain) rates for mobile phone calls are still very expensive.
> There are some bonuses for free calling when you sign-up for some offers
> but I find that options very limited and restrictive (calls must have
> place between X and Y
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:33:41 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 14:24:54 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> For those -friends, family, skype-friendly, etc...- I just simply use
>> the low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has and place them a
>> standard call.
>
> There some good deals
On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 14:24:54 +, Camaleón wrote:
> For those -friends, family, skype-friendly, etc...- I just simply use
> the low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has and place them a
> standard call.
There some good deals in the SIP --> PSTN world but, depending on your
country of
Excerpts from Andreas Weber's message of 2011-06-13 12:43:30 +0200:
> On 2011-06-13 11:19, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Afaik the audio codec skype uses is open now, but I too doubt that this
> > goes for the whole protocol. I doubt the situation will get better with
> > skype in the hands of ms.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:04:14 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
(...)
> Try converting your friends to open protocols instead ;) [not an easy
> task, i know]
For those -friends, family, skype-friendly, etc...- I just simply use
the low land-line/mobile rates my SIP provider has and place them a
st
On 2011-06-13 11:19, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Afaik the audio codec skype uses is open now, but I too doubt that this
> goes for the whole protocol. I doubt the situation will get better with
> skype in the hands of ms.
Ok, I didn't express myself clear enough, sorry for that.
Forget Skype. I
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:19, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> I doubt the situation will get better with
> skype in the hands of ms.
There was a thread about that recently. AFAIK it'll just get
integrated into MSN-Live or whatever it's called.
My 2¢
Nuno
--
Mars 2 Stay! But a torus on L1 first, p
Excerpts from Nuno Magalhães's message of 2011-06-13 00:04:14 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Not an expert, but skype uses its own proprietary protocol, i think
> (plus SIP to initiate), so i think you'd need a skype transport on
> your jabber server. Again, not an expert.
>
> Try converting your friends to op
Hi,
Not an expert, but skype uses its own proprietary protocol, i think
(plus SIP to initiate), so i think you'd need a skype transport on
your jabber server. Again, not an expert.
Try converting your friends to open protocols instead ;) [not an easy
task, i know]
HTH,
Nuno
--
Mars 2 Stay!
htt
18 matches
Mail list logo
