Re: proposed updates

2013-05-29 Thread Greg
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 19:45 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 29 mai 13, 11:27:17, Greg wrote: > > > > With the proposed-updates enabled: > > > > $ apt-cache policy > ... > > 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-proposed-updates/main amd64 > > Packages > > release > > v=7.0-upd

Re: proposed updates

2013-05-29 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 29 mai 13, 11:27:17, Greg wrote: > > With the proposed-updates enabled: > > $ apt-cache policy ... > 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-proposed-updates/main amd64 > Packages > release > v=7.0-updates,o=Debian,a=proposed-updates,n=wheezy-proposed-updates,l=Debian,c=main >

Re: proposed updates

2013-05-29 Thread Greg
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 10:43 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 28 mai 13, 10:55:23, Greg Cercy wrote: > > > > I followed instructions about using apt pinning to do this at: > > > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=432636 > > > > I'm running wheezy (not ubuntu, so I changed all referen

Re: proposed updates

2013-05-29 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 28 mai 13, 10:55:23, Greg Cercy wrote: > > I followed instructions about using apt pinning to do this at: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=432636 > > I'm running wheezy (not ubuntu, so I changed all references of fiesty to > wheezy. > > However none of the packages get remove

Re: proposed updates - part of Debian or not ?

2002-12-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:49:13PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > I've got a simple question: are the proposed updates part of the > official Debian distribution or not ? They are not part of the stable release. They're as much a part of the Debian distribution as unstable is. > Before reading tha

Re: Proposed Updates for "Potato"

2001-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:02:06PM +0200, Holger Rauch wrote: > This is a repost of the message I sent on Oct 22. It obviously didn't get > through. In case it did, and I was overlooking it, I apologize for any > inconvenience. > > I got a few questions concerning proposed updates: > > 1. Are the

Re: Proposed Updates for "Potato"

2001-10-22 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Holger, Holger Rauch wrote: > I got a few questions concerning proposed updates: > > 1. Are there proposed updates for "Potato"? AFAIK, there are only security updates, although these are very good. Add the following lines to your sources list, and upgrade normally using apt-get update && a

Re: Proposed-updates subdir?

1998-09-18 Thread stephen . p . ryan
On 18 Sep, Randy Edwards wrote: >Could someone tell me exactly what the dists/proposed-updates > subdirectory is for? > >Yes, I know it's for "proposed updates" ;-), but what for what dist? > Hamm? Slink? Does this subdir function as sort of a new "incoming" > type of subdir so that the

Re: Proposed-updates subdir?

1998-09-18 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 18 Sep 1998, Randy Edwards wrote: :Could someone tell me exactly what the dists/proposed-updates : subdirectory is for? : :Yes, I know it's for "proposed updates" ;-), but what for what dist? : Hamm? Slink? Does this subdir function as sort of a new "incoming" : type of su