On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Alec wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote:
> > | Hi
> > |
> > | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
> > | several days to run. I already figured that it's better t
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alec wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
> several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at"
> utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be
> bound to any specific te
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 20:21, Alec wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
> several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at"
> utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be
> bound to any spe
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 03:00, Alec wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote:
> > | Hi
> > |
> > | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
> > | several days to run. I already figured that it's
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote:
> | Hi
> |
> | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
> | several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using
> | "at" utility and collect t
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote:
| Hi
|
| I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take
| several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at"
| utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be
| bou
6 matches
Mail list logo
