On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:42:17PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Gregory,
>
> Am 2008-06-28 12:30:15, schrieb Gregory Seidman:
> > I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
> > ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to replace
> > the
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:06:15PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
>> Once I have the hardware, it's just a matter of figuring out how to set up
>> the iptables for NAT routing and appropriate firewalling. Actually, since I
>> don't have wireless needs at the moment, I can start worki
Hello Gregory,
Am 2008-06-28 12:30:15, schrieb Gregory Seidman:
> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
> ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to replace
> the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but I want
> to be
Gregory Seidman wrote:
Once I have the hardware, it's just a matter of figuring out how to set up
the iptables for NAT routing and appropriate firewalling. Actually, since I
don't have wireless needs at the moment, I can start working on it this
weekend even before I receive the wireless card, a
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT White
> Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the path of
> buying a new router/AP device.
>
> Alternatively, if you're set on using
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:03 AM, thveillon.debian
> Looks like Netgear is about to bring us a nice toy :
>
> "The high-performance WGR614L, which is "Works with Windows Vista"
Sorry to rain on the parade, but (to echo some comments on slashdot),
no pre-N, gigabit ethernet or usb ports? 4MB flash an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Let me add my name to the list of supporters. I originally installed a
D-Link but eventually replaced it with the 54GL. I also use the companion
Linksys range extender.
Larry
Looks like Netgear is about to bring us a nice toy :
"The high-performance WGR614L, whi
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
>>> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:59:34AM +0100, j t wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
> >> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
> >> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
>> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
>> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have the same issue with regards
>
> there has been some changes
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have the same issue with regards
there has been so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/08 17:41, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've heard of this. I was kind of hoping to do all this with Debian, but it
>> sounds like the WRT54GL is a better bet, but only if it can
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT
> White Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the
> path of buying a new router/AP device.
>
> Alternatively, if you're set on using your exist
Greg,
I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT White
Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the path of
buying a new router/AP device.
Alternatively, if you're set on using your existing box as your router/AP,
why not use a USB Wi-Fi device if y
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard of this. I was kind of hoping to do all this with Debian, but it
> sounds like the WRT54GL is a better bet, but only if it can actually
> firewall the wired subnet from the wireless subnet. A little bit of
> go
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 02:06:57PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
> >> th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
>> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato or
>> DD-WRT
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato or
> DD-WRT firmware.
OK, I've just spent 10 minutes searching for Linksys WRT56GL (a pair
of
Celejar wrote:
I'm considering these options, too. IIUC, another argument in favor of
the former option is the power draw; isn't it much lower for a SOHO
router than for a full blown computer running as a router?
Yes, you are correct. Plus the form factor, no upgrades, no keyboard,
etc. If o
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:50:51 -0400
"H.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I would say the consumer router choice (e.g. WRT-54G(L)) is the easiest
> to implement. The other choice, making a computer as a router, is quite
> involved but interesting (could be made very streamlined using a
> fire
Nick Lidakis wrote:
cables and antennas, would have been a big expense. It was much cheaper
to pick up a used Linksys WRT54G ($20 from Craigslist) and use it as a
Yup, going this way is going to be cheaper, no doubt. However, if the OP
goes the way he is thinking about (adding a multiport N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/28/08 22:05, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0200, oneman wrote:
>> On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>>
>>> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
>>> ethernet port. I'd
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0200, oneman wrote:
> On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
>> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
>> ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
>> replace the (wired only) LinkSys I have now
oneman wrote:
On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
replace
the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but I want
to be abl
On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
replace
the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but
I want
to be able to provide
25 matches
Mail list logo
