On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > > message should be for /var/mail/y2kmvs.lock and not /var/spool/mail.
>
> I like to peek into the binary to make sure of what I am getting.
> Therefore I ran 'strings' on /usr/bin/procmail and see this.
>
> strings /usr/bin/procmail |grep /var
>
Kenneth Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:55:30 -0500]:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Are you sure you are using procmail from woody? If so then that error
> Reasonably. I had been running Potato but did a dist-upgrade.
Sounds reasonable.
> > message should be for
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Are you sure you are using procmail from woody? If so then that error
Reasonably. I had been running Potato but did a dist-upgrade.
> message should be for /var/mail/y2kmvs.lock and not /var/spool/mail.
> /var/spool/mail should be a symlink to
Kenneth Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 11:43:43 -0500]:
> I am using Postfix on Woody as the MTA and procmail as the MDA. In
> my procmail log file, I see messages such as :
>
> procmail: Lock failure on "/var/spool/mail/y2kmvs.lock"
>
> The ownership of /var/spool/mail is r
4 matches
Mail list logo