Sorry, I sent it to Modestas only, not to the list
Vlada
Original Message
Subject:Re: problems with Gnome and KDE
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:12:25 +0200
From: Vladimir Kerka
Reply-To: ke...@dinmont.cz
Organization: Dinmont
To: Modestas Vainius
On 06
Hello,
On pirmadienis 06 Birželis 2011 00:44:59 Vladimir Kerka wrote:
> 2. major problem: I use KDE 4.6.X from Sid, but the session crashes
> immediately after start (this is the reason, I sent the copy to
> debian-kde). I tried to rename .kde in the home, no luck. More than that,
> when I try to
On 06/08/2011 03:26 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Lun 06 Jun 2011 16:08:17 Vladimir Kerka escribió:
Hi, Lisandro,
thanks for your reply.
I am using Sid for several years, with no major problems, I didn't
notice crashing window manager before.
I was not sure what to report for
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:44:59 +0200, Vladimir Kerka wrote:
> I really need help with two problems:
> 1. minor problem: whenever I start
> Gnome, there is message like this: "Jun 5 22:55:47 dunadan
> gnome-session[4527]: WARNING: Application 'nautilus.desktop' failed to
> register before timeout"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/08 06:17, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> God doesn't like Kiwis?
>
> Which god?
FSM, of course!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, th
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200
> > Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64
> >
> > Including me; I impor
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:05:14PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:18:01 +1200
> Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> > Are you running etch?
>
> No, Lenny here. GnuPG reports it's version 1.4.6.
Version: 1.4.6-2 for me on etch.
Although, it seems
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:18:01 +1200
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Chris,
> Are you running etch?
No, Lenny here. GnuPG reports it's version 1.4.6.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
You're a sid
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:53:34PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different
> IP addresses, with preference given to either 213.239.206.174 or
> 64.71.173.107. Try if you still have this problem when you specify one
> of these IPs as the
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200
> Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> > The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64
>
> Including me; I imported all three of the keys you ment
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> God doesn't like Kiwis?
Which god?
> But seriously, have you tried the verbose option?
Yes.
> > P.S. Also happens to keys: C02440B8 73CDA455
>
> They all work for me...
>
> $ gpg -v --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 73CDA455
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 06:12 -0700, Frank McCormick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:45:47 +0100
> Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200
> > Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jochen,
>
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different
Follow up to my last fup; no, maradns isn't the solution, sorry.
Using the IPs works, DNS times out apparently.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advance
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I
> > thought I'd mention a problem I've been having.
> >
> > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
[...]
> Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I
> thought I'd mention a problem I've been having.
>
> $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75
> gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server sub
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Chris,
> The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64
Including me; I imported all three of the keys you mentioned without
problems. Sorry, but I don't know enough about GPG & the serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/08 09:17, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200
>> Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jochen,
>>
>>> $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --rec
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200
> Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Jochen,
>
> > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949B
> > gpg: requesting key 3710949B from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
> > gpg: key
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:20:54AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I use mutt, and it invokes gpg which tries to grab keys it doesn't
> already have with the same symptom... up to about 60 seconds of
> waiting. What I don't know is what's happening during that
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:20:54 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> waiting. What I don't know is what's happening during that wait. Is it
> a matter of gpg not being able to contact the servers or do the
> servers take that long to run the query. It seems to run in
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:25:35AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:17:54 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> > What keyserver are you using Brad? I typically use mit, but the lag
>
> hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
>
> > days because it takes t
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:29:16 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Frank,
> No, Frank also knows, That key was uploaded months ago.
Yes, of course you do. My comment was not meant to reflect on you in
any way.
It's just typical that things updated at about the time of my prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:25:35 +0100
Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:17:54 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > What keyserver are you using Brad? I typically use mit, but the lag
> Was it me
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:17:54 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> What keyserver are you using Brad? I typically use mit, but the lag
hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
> days because it takes too long. I finally just now waited it
> out... about 45 seconds (okay, I guess I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/08 22:17, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:56:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:12:14 -0400
>> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Frank,
>>
>>> Typical is right - half the s
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:56:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:12:14 -0400
> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> > Typical is right - half the signed messages I get can't be verified.
>
> For me, that's a rare occurrence. Hence my calling att
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/08 08:15, Frank McCormick wrote:
[snip]
>
> Strange. The name according to htop and top is gnome-appearances and it
> appears to be spunoff by GDM.
Ah, that's why I don't see it!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Kittens give Morb
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:12:14 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Frank,
> Typical is right - half the signed messages I get can't be verified.
For me, that's a rare occurrence. Hence my calling attention to your
posts. As some would say; "Go figure"
--
Regards _
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:06:12 -0700
freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:59:04PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 06/03/08 08:29, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > >
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:45:47 +0100
Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200
> Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Jochen,
>
> > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949B
> > gpg: requesti
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200
Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jochen,
> $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949B
> gpg: requesting key 3710949B from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
> gpg: key 3710949B: "Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not changed
> gpg: Total numb
Brad Rogers:
> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All's well that ends.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Now, where is your PGP public key? It doesn't appear to be on the
> regular servers. As such, signing messages is, pretty much, redundant.
$ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:27:59 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Frank,
> All's well that ends.
Indeed.
Now, where is your PGP public key? It doesn't appear to be on the
regular servers. As such, signing messages is, pretty much, redundant.
--
Regards _
/ )
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:59:04PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/03/08 08:29, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > After months of using IceWm, I installed gnome-core to get some of the
> > functions only available with Gnome. Now eveytime I use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For future reference--- I had a GTK2.0-rc file sitting in my home dir.
Drove Gnome absolutely nuts!!
All's well that ends.
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:46:23 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:59:04 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/03/08 08:29, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > After months of using IceWm, I installed gnome-core to get some of
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/08 08:29, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> After months of using IceWm, I installed gnome-core to get some of the
> functions only available with Gnome. Now eveytime I use the appearance
> item on the menu, when I am finished, gnome-appearance st
On Dec 29, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
The computer in question is an OldWorld PowerMac Apple Macintosh,
"Beige G3" tower. This problem only happens on this machine. It
does not occur on my G4 test box.
I have a Beige G3 "Gossamer", not a tower, but it's prac
Oh, that's a nasty #404876; I'll try to provide a useful backtrace. I
really should read all messges before replying.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> The computer in question is an OldWorld PowerMac Apple Macintosh,
> "Beige G3" tower. This problem only happens on this machine. It
> does not occur on my G4 test box.
I have a Beige G3 "Gossamer", not a tower, but it's practically the
same.
> I'd very much appreciat
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 15:06:31 -0600, edwardsa wrote:
>I just upgraded a laptop running stable to testing and the gnome
>terminal seems partially broken. There is now task bar with "File
>Edit ..." Also, the font is rather large and stuck. Is there a config
>file through which I can change this
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 15:06:31 -0600, edwardsa wrote:
>I just upgraded a laptop running stable to testing and the gnome
>terminal seems partially broken. There is now task bar with "File
>Edit ..." Also, the font is rather large and stuck. Is there a config
>file through which I can change this
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:37 -0300, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> Sorry, I`ve mistaken the e-mails.
>
> Anyway, as I told before I`m having trouble with Gnome, as it doesn`t
> show the panel saying that there`s already a panel running, doesn`t
> show desktop icons or the main menu. As a palliative method
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In addition to killing the errant gnome processes, I'd:
$ mv .gnome .gnome.old
$ mv .gnome2 .gnome2.old
$ mv .gnome2_private .gnome2_private.old
And then run startx.
Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> Sorry, I`ve mistaken the e-mails.
>
> Anyway, as I told be
Sorry, I`ve mistaken the e-mails.Anyway, as I told before I`m having trouble with Gnome, as it doesn`t show the panel saying that there`s already a panel running, doesn`t show desktop icons or the main menu. As a palliative method to solve this I`ve been removing files such as .xsession-errors .gtk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> These panel problems appears when I log through gdm.
Disable gdm and use startx from the CLI. This way, *before* you run
startx, run "ps aux | grep gnome" to see if there are any errant
processes hanging around.
> On 9/5/06,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> Gnome's been giving me trouble recently. Sometime it doesn't show the main
> menu, the archives listed on desktop or doesn't initialize the panel saying
> that there's already a running panel. I've been deleting some archives li
I know that this has already been said by both Eric and Crispin, but just to
reiterate, DO NOT USE THE XIMIAN PACKAGES (sorry for shouting). The last time
I tried them out (which was over a year ago), they were utter crap. Using the
official deb packages and apt-get are going to make your life
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 14:52, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used redhat 7.2 with ximian gnome until this week that I have
> installed debian instead of redhat. I installed potato and then I
> upgraded to woody.
>
> To install ximian gnome I add
> deb http://red-carpet.ximian.co
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:52:43AM +0200, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used redhat 7.2 with ximian gnome until this week that I have
> installed debian instead of redhat. I installed potato and then I
> upgraded to woody.
^
>
> To install ximian gnome I add
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:05:59AM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
| I finally bit the bullet, and "upgraded" one of my Progeny machines to
| woody this weekend.
|
| Things went reasonably well, althoug certainly not automaticly.
|
| In any case, when I loged inot a Gnome session, things were not very
|
On 2000-10-05 11:40:20, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, so I install windowmaker, and chose it in the gnome control panel.
> > It's listed as my current WM. However, I'm in enlightenment.
>
> Try to change to enlightenment and then immedi
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:40:20AM +0200, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
>
> Try to change to enlightenment and then immediately change back to
> WindowMaker. This helped with WindowMaker and sawfish here, when I
> wanted to run sawfish and after some major upgrading Gnome didn't
> recognize any wm runn
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, so I install windowmaker, and chose it in the gnome control panel.
> It's listed as my current WM. However, I'm in enlightenment.
Try to change to enlightenment and then immediately change back to
WindowMaker. This helped with WindowMake
--- Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded GNOME last night with apt, and it seems like it installed the
> programs that come with GNOME, but when I boot up, the GNOME bar-type thing
> isn't there.
You mean the panel? Package gnome-panel IIRC.
The easiest way to get a worki
55 matches
Mail list logo
