Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't gotten offlineimap working yet, but am not convinced that
> "any changes you do on the local end get changed on the server."
Yes, that's one of the current limitations (I do this so seldom, I
forgot). I guess for those instances, you would have to
Dnia piątek, 7 października 2005 17:11, Ric Otte napisał:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> > On 07/10/05, Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:46:43PM -0400, Ryan Claycamp wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 at 2211 -0700, John L Fjells
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 at 0811 -0700, Ric Otte wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
>> On 07/10/05, Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I haven't gotten offlineimap working yet, but am not convinced that
>> > "any changes you do on the local end get changed on the
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> On 07/10/05, Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:46:43PM -0400, Ryan Claycamp wrote:
> > > On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 at 2211 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> > > >Best solution for filtering is probably what Rob
On 07/10/05, Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:46:43PM -0400, Ryan Claycamp wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 at 2211 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> > >Best solution for filtering is probably what Roberto suggested. If
> > >that's impossible, you should look into offli
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:46:43PM -0400, Ryan Claycamp wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 at 2211 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> >Best solution for filtering is probably what Roberto suggested. If
> >that's impossible, you should look into offlineimap. Basically, it
> >syncs your local Mail with the
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 at 2211 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote:
>Best solution for filtering is probably what Roberto suggested. If
>that's impossible, you should look into offlineimap. Basically, it
>syncs your local Mail with the IMAP. Since it's IMAP, any changes you
>do on the local end gets chang
Hi,
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
The other things you want to do are easy and others will certainly
comment on
how to accomplish them. I want to point out that step 2 should not be
handled
by mutt. If you are the admin of the server, or you can convince the
admin of
the server to it, install a
Cameron Matheson wrote:
> 2. mutt filters the mail into folders based on certian rules (mailing
> lists, etc.)
I've never done this, but from the description it looks like imapfilter
can do it:
$ apt-cache show imapfilter
Package: imapfilter
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Installed-Size: 148
Ma
You're better off using something like sieve to filter mail into IMAP folders
on the server. This way you get to use other clients (webmail,
thunderbird, whatever)
and still keep your filters.
Most mail servers will have some way of sorting mail into folders as
it arrives,
check your docs.
On 05/
Best solution for filtering is probably what Roberto suggested. If
that's impossible, you should look into offlineimap. Basically, it
syncs your local Mail with the IMAP. Since it's IMAP, any changes you
do on the local end gets changed on the server. It's especially nice
solution for laptops (wh
Quoting Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2. mutt filters the mail into folders based on certian rules (mailing
lists, etc.)
3. mutt keeps all mail on server
w/ the POP of course i had to download the mail, so i used procmail
for the filtering. Is what i'm wanting to do even possible (i
On (05/10/05 16:52), Cameron Matheson wrote:
> I've been using mutt happily w/ my POP email account for a good long
> while now, but i'm switching over to an IMAP server. I've been using
> thunderbird (which is cool, but it's eating up sooo much RAM), and i
> would like to go back to mutt. Rea
13 matches
Mail list logo
