MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone have an idea how to make wvdial use pppd with the -d flag for
> debugging?
It's been a long time since I used wvdial but I notice from an
old backup that I had a file /etc/ppp/peers/wvdial with a few
pppd options in it so I guess that wvdial could be
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:05:25PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a problem connecting to my ISP with
> Debian Potato 2.2r2 and Wvdial
> It dials correctly and pppd is started properly
> but I can not ping to any web adress ping command just hangs
> my /etc/resolv.conf has proper DNS entr
Hi
Did you recompiled the kernel? I think you might miss out some
option in ppp part in the kernel.
Edwin Lau
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:37:38 John Hasler wrote:
> Tiarnan O Corrain writes:
> > for some reason pppd doesn't work under the 2.4.1 kernel.
> > ...
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Put 'kd
Tiarnan O Corrain writes:
> for some reason pppd doesn't work under the 2.4.1 kernel.
> ...
> Any suggestions?
Put 'kdebug 4' in /etc/ppp/options, try again, and post the result.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:19:37AM +, Tiarnan O Corrain wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> for some reason pppd doesn't work under the 2.4.1 kernel. I have a
> 2.4.0 kernel installed on my computer which invokes pppd perfectly,
> but when I try pon under 2.4.1, I get the following melancholy missive
> (fro
Chris writes:
> Does anyone know why printing debug output would cause pppd to fail in
> this way?
Broken software at the other end, most likely. Just turn off compression.
It makes little difference over a modem anyway since the modem is doing
compression.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John
> Jan 29 16:08:45 raven pppd[2118]: rcvd [CCP ResetReq id=0x4]
> Jan 29 16:08:45 raven pppd[2118]: sent [CCP ResetAck id=0x4]
> Jan 29 16:08:55 raven pppd[2118]: rcvd [CCP ResetReq id=0x5]
> Jan 29 16:08:55 raven pppd[2118]: sent [CCP ResetAck id=0x5]
> Jan 29 16:08:55 raven ppp
I wrote:
> Yes, but you shouldn't have to. It's a bug somewhere. The puzzlement is
> that I have the same version of pppd as Bob does but I don't have the bug.
Bob Hilliard writes:
> I have upgraded my potato partition to 2.3.7-2. It has the same behavior
> as 2.3.5-2. When I execute pon, it c
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robbie writes:
> > I had this problem...just touch .ppprc, and everything should be OK.
> > It worked for me, at least.
>
> Yes, but you shouldn't have to. It's a bug somewhere. The puzzlement is
> that I have the same version of pppd as Bob does but I
Robbie writes:
> I had this problem...just touch .ppprc, and everything should be OK.
> It worked for me, at least.
Yes, but you shouldn't have to. It's a bug somewhere. The puzzlement is
that I have the same version of pppd as Bob does but I don't have the bug.
--
John HaslerTh
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 12:33:36PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> I upgraded one partition to potato a week ago, and whenever I try
> pon, I get the following message:
>
> bob:vc-ty1:bob>pon /usr/sbin/pppd: Can't open options file
> /home/bob/.ppprc: Function not implemented
I had this problem
Bob Hilliard writes:
> I upgraded one partition to potato a week ago, and whenever I try
> pon, I get the following message:
> bob:vc-ty1:bob>pon /usr/sbin/pppd: Can't open options file
> /home/bob/.ppprc: Function not implemented
> I had used pppconfig earlier, and re-ran it after I got these
>
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Finally, the pppd kept demanding a .ppprc file,...
>
> That's weird.
I upgraded one partition to potato a week ago, and whenever I try
pon, I get the following message:
bob:vc-ty1:bob>pon /usr/sbin/pppd: Can't open options file
/home/bob/.ppprc: F
Chris writes:
> I added a user to the dialout group,
> modified the permissions on all of the files in a reasonable manner,
The pppd files are in the 'dip' group. Did you change them?
> Now, I have modified the permissions on my modem a number of times, but
> the pppd used to reply:
Since pppd
> > # pon
> > Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support (from pppd, I think)
>
> Okay, first off... this message is VERY misleading. What this really means
> is that the pppd was denied, and it's assuming that the kernel lacks support
> for it.
>
> In my case, it was that I was giving it t
>
> Help! (-:
[snip]
> # pon
> Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support (from pppd, I think)
Okay, first off... this message is VERY misleading. What this really means
is that the pppd was denied, and it's assuming that the kernel lacks support
for it.
In my case, it was that I was g
> > # pon
> > Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support (from pppd, I think)
>
> AFAIK is this a 2.0.24 Kernel problem, since others reported that, too.
Ack! I wonder why purging diald started it off not working - how
intriguing. Do you know of any work-arounds? Will a different version
In your email to me, Bernd Eckenfels, you wrote:
>
> > # pon
> > Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support (from pppd, I think)
>
> AFAIK is this a 2.0.24 Kernel problem, since others reported that, too.
Then there are systems like buoy.com that are running 16 ports with
ppp and no prob
> # pon
> Sorry - this system lacks PPP kernel support (from pppd, I think)
AFAIK is this a 2.0.24 Kernel problem, since others reported that, too.
Greetings
Bernd
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTE
19 matches
Mail list logo
