On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:07:00PM -0700, nate wrote:
> D.U. said:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
> > kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
> > mod
nate wrote:
D.U. said:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
modules loaded at all. However, I can insmod eepro if I
giv
D.U. said:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
> kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
> modules loaded at all. However, I can insmod eepro if I
> give it the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The release notes didn't say there were any problems going
> > from 2.2 to 2.4. What did I forget to do?
>
> If you modified /etc/lilo.conf to add the new kernel, did you remember to
> type "lilo" before rebooting? Not doin
D.U. said:
> I searched but didn't find anything in google...
>
> I upgraded a box to 3.0 and that part went fine. But then I
> upgraded to the standard 2.4.18 kernel image deb (from a 2.2
> kernel.
did you add the initrd option to lilo.conf? the 2.4 kernel (at
least the default one) has a real bi
5 matches
Mail list logo