Re: poppassd

2002-06-23 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.10.0127 +0100]: > Potato has 1.2-14 as its latest for poppasswd... I agree that > v1.8-ceti would be a better solution, especially considering the > security issues you cited. What does it take to get this version into > the security updates?

Re: poppassd

2002-01-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.10.0127 +0100]: > Potato has 1.2-14 as its latest for poppasswd... I agree that > v1.8-ceti would be a better solution, especially considering the > security issues you cited. What does it take to get this version into > the security updates?

Re: poppassd

2002-01-09 Thread Micah Anderson
Potato has 1.2-14 as its latest for poppasswd... I agree that v1.8-ceti would be a better solution, especially considering the security issues you cited. What does it take to get this version into the security updates? A bug filed? Micah On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, Steve Mickeler wrote: > > I'm using

Re: poppassd

2002-01-09 Thread Steve Mickeler
I'm using poppassd v1.8-ceti from http://www.ceti.com.pl/~kravietz/prog.html It doesnt suffer from any of the problems you described below. 1) I cant use an old password, only the current password will work to change the password 2) It is PAM aware 3) It supports MD5 I also make sure that