On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Christopher W. Aiken wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote:
> -|Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only
> -|the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that
> -|restrictive?
>
> I'm a Debian n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Parrish M Myers wrote:
> Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only
> the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that
> restrictive?
The pine license doesn't allow distribution of *modified*
b
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote:
-|Hi,
-|
-|Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only
-|the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that
-|restrictive?
-|
-|Parrish Myers
-|
I'm a Debian newbee and wondered the same t
Vitux writes:
> Just a pitiful newbie wondering: I thought all *nix'es were supposed to
> use basically the same filesystem-structure.
The various Linux distributions are far more standardized in this then the
various Unices ever were.
> How come then, that Debian has proprietary placement of fil
At 05:44 PM 5/20/00 +0200, Vitux wrote [in part]:
>Just a pitiful newbie wondering: I thought all *nix'es were
>supposed to use basically the same filesystem-structure. How
>come then, that Debian has proprietary placement of files?
>(maybe I've missed a point here, but isn't that part of the
>ide
Will Lowe wrote:
>
> > Can I ask why debian doesn't include pine? Just curious. I know Debian
>
> The license for pine doesn't allow you to redistribute "modified binaries"
> (e.g., fix a bug in the source, compile it, and redistribute the
> executable you get from this). Therefore, it can't b
6 matches
Mail list logo
