> Is there anybody working on a port of pine version 4.05 or any other
> version
> later than 4.0?
in /project/experimental, there are the relevant files to
build-it-yourself.
Debian is not allowed to distribute modified pine binaries.
HTH,
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
> >
> >> from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
> >> installed)
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >
> >But this explains it:
> >
> >Although the above trademark and copy
>> "d" == dsb3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
d> maybe this is too pedantic, but are you saying:
d> 1) it can be distributed in binary form using unpatched sources ONLY, or
This one is true.
Ciao,
Martin
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
>
>> from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
>> installed)
>>
>> [snip]
>
>But this explains it:
>
>Although the above trademark and copyright restrictions do not convey
>the right to redistribut
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
>
> from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
> installed)
>
> [snip]
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose and without fee to the University of
> Washington is hereby gra
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, D'jinnie wrote:
>I've been trying to compile pine 4.05 (with the sl5 option, for shadowed
>pw) and it barfs on undefined references to crypt and can't find
>ltermcap...any ideas? P.S. What is it about the license that doesn't allow
>Debian to make a package out of it? They hav
6 matches
Mail list logo
