Hi,
On 21 Feb 2002, Shriram Shrikumar wrote:
> > So basically you ran partition magic, fixed the problem and now everything
> > works fine? Great. I became curious, so could you please send me another
> > fdisk -l an fdisk -l -u from your current situation? Let's see how it's
> > solved.
>
> fdisk
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 16:01, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 Feb 2002, Shriram Shrikumar wrote:
>
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > tried booting into win98 again and it worked. LILO was still giving me
> > trouble when running it(NOT when booting) - something along the lines
> > of,
> >
> > Device 0x0
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:01:39PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > tried booting into win98 again and it worked. LILO was still giving me
> > trouble when running it(NOT when booting) - something along the lines
These stupid boundary issues arise only with Windoze. If you want to
live with damb OSs,
Hi,
On 20 Feb 2002, Shriram Shrikumar wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> tried booting into win98 again and it worked. LILO was still giving me
> trouble when running it(NOT when booting) - something along the lines
> of,
>
> Device 0x0300: Invalid partition table, 1st entry
> 3D address: 32/1/0 (9
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 20:52, Sebastiaan wrote:
> But as I see, hda1 ends on block 2548269 and hda2 starts at 2538270.
So
> whatever you want to do, it will cause data loss. hda1 is as big as it
can
> be, so if you make it bigger you will erase a part of the linux
partition
> (the mo
5 matches
Mail list logo