Re: pam_limits setrlimit log message

2004-01-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.05.1046 +0100]: > Did you look at the bug list? I pointed you to it (let's say, > #171673) because there's an explanation from me there. call me lazy... thx for the explicit pointer... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read th

Re: pam_limits setrlimit log message

2004-01-05 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:51:16AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.05.0035 +0100]: > > There are bugs filed on ssh about this; please see them. (And > > don't worry about it; it's essentially cosmetic.) > > What's the rlimit? I am just wonderin

Re: pam_limits setrlimit log message

2004-01-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.05.0035 +0100]: > There are bugs filed on ssh about this; please see them. (And > don't worry about it; it's essentially cosmetic.) What's the rlimit? I am just wondering why pam_limits inhibits and logs the event even though limits.conf is emp

Re: pam_limits setrlimit log message

2004-01-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:31:19PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > I am seeing messages of the following sort on one of my systems: > > pam_limits[25721]: setrlimit limit #6 to soft=-1, hard=-1 failed: > Operation not permitted; uid=1000 euid=1000 There are bugs filed on ssh about this; pleas