Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-26 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Eric Gaumer wrote: On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 07:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Eric Gaumer wrote: 2 Yea there were a few more posts this morning (LKML) so definitely check out those archives. I applied the patch that was in LKML: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/23/75 The errors h

Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-25 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Eric Gaumer wrote: On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 07:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Eric Gaumer wrote: 2 Yea there were a few more posts this morning (LKML) so definitely check out those archives. I applied the patch that was in LKML: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/23/75 The errors have disappeared using t

Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-25 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Eric Gaumer wrote: On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 07:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Eric Gaumer wrote: On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:20 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi Debian! In 2.6.9 I am seeing for the first time: debian kernel: realplay.bin: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x21 Followed by more me

Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-25 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 07:35 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Eric Gaumer wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:20 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > > >>Hi Debian! > >> > >>In 2.6.9 I am seeing for the first time: > >> > >>debian kernel: realplay.bin: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x21 > >> >

Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-25 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Eric Gaumer wrote: On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:20 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi Debian! In 2.6.9 I am seeing for the first time: debian kernel: realplay.bin: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x21 Followed by more messages mentioning modules. It does not seem to cause any noticable problem: re

Re: page allocation failure

2004-10-24 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:20 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi Debian! > > In 2.6.9 I am seeing for the first time: > > debian kernel: realplay.bin: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x21 > > Followed by more messages mentioning modules. > > It does not seem to cause any noticable problem: