Re: packages not on hold

2005-09-19 Thread Brett
Marc Wilson wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51:57PM +1000, brett wrote: Obviously apt wants to replace my packages with the official debian packages. This was working fine before the recent squid security update... No, obviously apt-get is NOT going to replace your packages with the ones fr

Re: packages not on hold

2005-09-16 Thread Marc Wilson
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51:57PM +1000, brett wrote: > Obviously apt wants to replace my packages with the official debian > packages. This was working fine before the recent squid security update... No, obviously apt-get is NOT going to replace your packages with the ones from the archive. Th

Re: packages not on hold

2005-09-16 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51:57PM +1000, brett wrote: > Greetings, > I have been trying to put some self compiled packages on hold, but for some > reason apt seems to be ignoring the "hold" status. See below: > > xx:/home/$user# dpkg --get-selections | grep squid > squid

Re: packages not on hold

2005-09-16 Thread Maurits van Rees
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51:57PM +1000, brett wrote: > The following packages have been kept back: >squid (2.5.9-10sarge1 => 2.5.9-10sarge1) >squid-common (2.5.9-10sarge1 => 2.5.9-10sarge1) > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. > > Obviously apt wants to replac