Re: package libcommonc++-dev kept back

2001-06-08 Thread Alex Suzuki
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:15:16AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > It turns out that the bug is a build problem with autoconf 2.50, so I > think you can safely ignore that and install the package from unstable. Thanks : ) Alex -- Alex Suzuki | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cynox.ch To send me an e

Re: package libcommonc++-dev kept back

2001-06-07 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote: >The quickest way to get woody fixed there is to have the newer package >fully installed, but it seems to have a release-critical bug filed >against it. Since the bug tracking system is down, I can't find out what >it is. If it's not something that would affe

Re: package libcommonc++-dev kept back

2001-06-07 Thread Colin Watson
Alex Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > libcommonc++-dev: Depends: libcommonc++-1.4 (= 1.4.2-1) but it is not >installable >E: Sorry, broken packages >-- > >What's wrong? Does anybody know this? It's quite annoying to see >that message e