On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:25:58 + (UTC), Curt wrote:
>> [makes fun of opposing viewpoint rather than refuting it or leaving it alone]
> [is joined by rest of thread]
Yes! Down with he who thinks differently! Hurray! These high-falutin'
smart-talkin' weirdos with their funny words and strange b
On 2015-11-23, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:29:53AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> Why am I not surprised that a large thread ostensibly about "Adobe Flash" has
>> devolved into two people arguing the definition of terms with each other. Can
>> you at least change the Subjec
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:29:53AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Why am I not surprised that a large thread ostensibly about "Adobe Flash" has
> devolved into two people arguing the definition of terms with each other. Can
> you at least change the Subject when you change the subject, or better
Why am I not surprised that a large thread ostensibly about "Adobe Flash" has
devolved into two people arguing the definition of terms with each other. Can
you at least change the Subject when you change the subject, or better yet,
take it off-list?
Thank You for Your time and answer, Victor:
>OpenVZ is the best alternative for operating system level virtualization,
>like Boyd I don't like VServer either.
>
>BTW Boyd, Xen is backed up by Citrix, not Novell. ;-)
>
>KVM and Xen are hardware virtualization technologies.
Can You argument, at le
Thank You for Your time and answer, Douglas:
>Unless something has changed, to be really secure, virtualization has to
>be fully supported in the hardware of the CPU so that there are no CPU
>instructions that can be issued from within the virtual machine to break
>out of it. i386/amd64 don't mee
Laurent:
>Beyond the question, what is the interest to virtualize services. I understand
>the need to virtualize different machine for OS specific server software,
>tests and so on.
For the Internet services security reasons - for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:39:38AM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Douglas A. Tutty
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:46:49PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:02:27 +0
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:39:38AM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:46:49PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:02:27 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > > > On 22-05-2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
>
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:46:49PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:02:27 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > > On 22-05-2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
> > > > How I can organize a Operating system-level virtualization on
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:46:49PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:02:27 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > On 22-05-2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
> > > How I can organize a Operating system-level virtualization on a server
> > > for every service I would isolate?
> >
> > Use a ch
On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:02:27 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 22-05-2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
> > Good day.
> >
> > How I can organize a Operating system-level virtualization on a server
> > for every service I would isolate?
> >
> > Thank You for Your time.
> >
> >
>
> Use a chroot (s
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
> In <4a1c2c45.1c05d00a.3255.5...@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote:
> >Thank You for Your time and answer, Sylvain:
> >> Use a chroot (standard) or a vserver (search for vserver in debian
> >
> >AFAIK, it is no
In <4a1c2c45.1c05d00a.3255.5...@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote:
>Thank You for Your time and answer, Sylvain:
>> Use a chroot (standard) or a vserver (search for vserver in debian
>
>AFAIK, it is not safe to use chroot - for an evil doer can logout from
>chroot once it detects it.
Escaping a good
Thank You for Your time and answer, Sylvain:
> Use a chroot (standard) or a vserver (search for vserver in debian
AFAIK, it is not safe to use chroot - for an evil doer can logout from
chroot once it detects it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Hello,
On 22-05-2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> How I can organize a Operating system-level virtualization on a server
> for every service I would isolate?
>
> Thank You for Your time.
>
>
Use a chroot (standard) or a vserver (search for vserver in debian
archives there is a kernel versio
Hello
Thomas H. George (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> When I start oopadmin it first writes "Operating system does not
> support locale" to the terminal and then starts.
>
> My operating system is kernel-2.4.27 compiled from tha latest
> kernel-source-2.4.27 release. I paged through make menuco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:45:26PM -0400, stan & nin wrote:
> I have a question for you my system comes up with operating system
> not found i have tried different things but nothing works HP doesnt
> give recovery disc no more so i cant go that way e
"stan & nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
(Please post to the mailing list in plain text only, not HTML, and set
your mailer to wrap lines at 72 characters.)
> I have a question for you my system comes up with operating system
> not found i h
19 matches
Mail list logo
