Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On 8/06/19 3:16 AM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:38 AM Jonathan Dowland > wrote: > > > You're quite right. I frequently mix up stretch and squeeze: the > forthcoming > run of Buster, Bullseye and Bookworm will be far more confusing >

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On 07/06/2019 16:27, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Paul Sutton wrote: >> I agree with the naming convention and subsequent names starting with >> the same letter can cause confusion.   However Toy Story 5 (or is it 4) >> is out at some point so that may give us

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Paul Sutton wrote: > I agree with the naming convention and subsequent names starting with > the same letter can cause confusion.   However Toy Story 5 (or is it 4) > is out at some point so that may give us a whole new set of names to > choose from. Toy S

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On 07/06/2019 16:16, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:38 AM Jonathan Dowland > wrote: > > > You're quite right. I frequently mix up stretch and squeeze: the > forthcoming > run of Buster, Bullseye and Bookworm will be far more confusing >

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:38 AM Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > You're quite right. I frequently mix up stretch and squeeze: the > forthcoming > run of Buster, Bullseye and Bookworm will be far more confusing for me :-( > Perhaps it is time to switch to a different movie franchise. LOTR? How could yo

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:00:17AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Since you say "current" stable, I assume you mean stretch. The support for squeeze (even LTS) ended quite some time ago :-) You're quite right. I frequently mix up stretch and squeeze: the forthcoming run of Buster, Bullseye a

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

Ah sorry, missed the deb9u1. Thanks. On Thu, Jun 6, 2019, 5:23 AM Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:17PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > >However, today 3 Jun 2019 we see in tracker.debian.org for openjdk-8 that > >"[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u222-b04-1 (source) int

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:17PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > However, today 3 Jun 2019 we see in tracker.debian.org for openjdk-8 that > > "[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u222-b04-1 (source) into experimental" and > > "

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

. Chiunque riceva questo messaggio per errore è pregato di distruggerlo e di informare immediatamente [ mailto:i...@sigmaware.it | info@ ] asterweb.org - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Dowland" To: "debian-user" Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 12:22:41 PM Subject: R

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:17PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: However, today 3 Jun 2019 we see in tracker.debian.org for openjdk-8 that "[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u222-b04-1 (source) into experimental" and "[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u212-b03-2~deb9u1 (source amd64 all) into pro

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:17PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: >However, today 3 Jun 2019 we see in [1]tracker.debian.org for openjdk-8 >that  >"[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u222-b04-1 (source) into experimental" >and >"[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u212-b03-2~deb9u1

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

However, today 3 Jun 2019 we see in tracker.debian.org for openjdk-8 that "[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u222-b04-1 (source) into experimental" and "[2019-06-03] Accepted openjdk-8 8u212-b03-2~deb9u1 (source amd64 all) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates (Moritz Muehlenhoff) (sig

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On 2019-05-31, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: >> "BR" == Brad Rogers writes: > >BR> Not from Debian. See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjdk-8 > >BR> Short version: It's been removed and (to me it looks like) won't >BR> be back. > > Do they run IcedTea against the OpenJDK 11 ? > Java Web Start

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Fri, 31 May 2019 15:55:55 + Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Hello Gian, >Do they run IcedTea against the OpenJDK 11 ? I don't run IcedTea myself. I found no need for it. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" I must

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

> "BR" == Brad Rogers writes: BR> Not from Debian. See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjdk-8 BR> Short version: It's been removed and (to me it looks like) won't BR> be back. Do they run IcedTea against the OpenJDK 11 ? -- /\ ___Ubuntu: a

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Fri, 31 May 2019 11:20:58 -0400 Larry Martell wrote: Hello Larry, >Is it possible to get openjdk-8-jre for buster? Not from Debian. See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjdk-8 Short version: It's been removed and (to me it looks like) won't be back. -- Regards _ / )

Re: openjdk-8-jre for buster

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:20:58AM -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >Is it possible to get openjdk-8-jre for buster?  If you specifically want to install the Debian packages, you will have to add 'unstable' sources to your sources.list and install from there. Note that you will want to make careful