On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
> My Domain SMB knowledge is slightly rusty but here goes...
>
> 1. Your Samba server's ip address ends with a 0, which, AFAIK, is
> reserved for network addresses (unless it has some special purpose
> like the the /32 netmask). What is the output of
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Siju George wrote:
>
> I have installed
> ii samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny9 a
> ii samba-common 2:3.2.5-4lenny9
> On Debian Lenny and i am sharing directories to Windows Users successfully.
>
> I configur
michael wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:49 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> michael wrote:
>> [...]
I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
nslookup. Is there something I n
michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 13:17 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > > On T
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 01:31 +0100, Jamin Davis wrote:
> Samuel Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
> >> search
> >> nameserver 158.152.1.58
> >> nameserver 158.152.1.42
> >
> > In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
> > say in
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 13:17 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:49 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> michael wrote:
> [...]
> >> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> >> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> >> nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get
michael wrote:
[...]
>> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
>> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
>> nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note
>> I can still access the e-World from my Debian
Samuel Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
>> search
>> nameserver 158.152.1.58
>> nameserver 158.152.1.42
>
> In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
> say in English?):
Here marks the spot? :)
I use Demon, the second entry from
some dsl routers "require" that the clients points to the router itself as the
dns server.
In other words:
Try to use the following /etc/resolv.conf in the client:
nameserver
Regards
On Thursday 16 August 2007 14:47, michael wrote:
> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and thi
michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
<>
> > I'll investigate. thanks, Michael
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:48 -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:15:45PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > > michael <[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:15:45PM +0100, michael wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have just replaced my USB modem
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > > to be working find on my D
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> > nslookup. Is there
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note
> I can still acc
On 16 Aug 2007, at 14:12, Samuel Bächler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
search
nameserver 158.152.1.58
nameserver 158.152.1.42
In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
say in English?):
I entered your nameserver in my resolv.conf and it did not work.
For
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
search
nameserver 158.152.1.58
nameserver 158.152.1.42
In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
say in English?):
I entered your nameserver in my resolv.conf and it did not work.
For now try to use my configuration:
search foo.ch
nam
2006/4/13, George Borisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> >
> > is this normal?
>
> Yes, if reverse zone has not been configured properly. Try:
>
> nslookup 64.233.183.25
>
> This will work properly.
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --
> George Borisov
>
> DXSolutions Ltd
>
>
>
>
The respo
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
>
> is this normal?
Yes, if reverse zone has not been configured properly. Try:
nslookup 64.233.183.25
This will work properly.
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
> As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> LAN to the real authority for funkypenguin.net?
>
> Give us more info on how you have your domain s
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:10:18PM +, Mark C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just set up bind for my internal network, and running:
>
> 'nslookup funkypenguin.net' returns:
>
> Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:10:40PM +0100, JG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> > seem to find nslookup.
> >
> > I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
> > moment
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:36:24AM -0500, stan wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
> moment doesn't have it.
For installed packages 'dpkg -S ' g
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:36:24 -0500
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I
> can't seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building
> at the moment doesn't have it.
# apt-cache search dns
I think the preffered command to the nslookup is dig.
It should give you as much functionality, or even more, then nslookup.
Bojan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:47:06AM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, stan wrote:
>
> > I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, stan wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
> moment doesn't have it.
Seems to be in dnsutils, according to packages.debian.org
* Rob Weir ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030225 15:41]:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:20:55AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> > I had a host, but not this host. It seems nslookup is deprecated in
> > favor of host. Thanks.
>
> In favour of dig, IIRC.
Either one:
doozer:~% nslookup
Note: nslookup is depreca
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:20:55AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> Rus Foster wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gary Turner wrote:
> >
> >> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> >> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> >> ptknslookup in
Rus Foster wrote:
>
> Its in the "host" package
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
> host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
Actually, you probably want bind9-host instead of host. Host is a
replacement for nslookup. But because of an unfortunate collisions of
names will suffer
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:56:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:59:02PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > IMO, this is a real shame... I always used host for 1-shot lookups
> > and nslookup for deeper troubleshooting or when I wanted an
> > interactive interface for some
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:25:02AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > According to the "search contents of packages" utility at
> > packages.debian.org it's in the dnsutils package in testing (and also
> > zsh, apparently).
>
> You can achieve the same results using
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:59:02PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> IMO, this is a real shame... I always used host for 1-shot lookups
> and nslookup for deeper troubleshooting or when I wanted an
> interactive interface for some other reason.
host(1) does everything that nslookup(1) did, but doe
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:25:02AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> According to the "search contents of packages" utility at
> packages.debian.org it's in the dnsutils package in testing (and also
> zsh, apparently).
You can achieve the same results using apt-file search
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:44:19AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
bind9-host. I think it's in sarge...
Gary Turner wrote:
>I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
>I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
>ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
Many thanks to all who answered. I installed dnsutils (which means I
wasn't total
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:25:19AM -0600, Will Trillich wrote:
> i seem to recall seeing that nslookup is deprecated. we're
> supposed to use dig or zone or dnsquery now. (probably there's a
> good reason, or maybe my other personality just made this all
> up.)
It is deprecated, or at least that's
Gary, you got a lot of advice...
But what I think you want is "dig"
> apt-get install dig
> man dig
> dig -x www.debian.org
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: nslookup --
"Gary" == Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look,
Gary> the sillier I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The
Gary> closest I've come is ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg.
Gary> I'd prefer non X.
~$ dpkg -S
Rus Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gary Turner wrote:
>
> > I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> > I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> > ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
> >
> > R
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rus Foster wrote:
> Its in the "host" package
>
> rghf@duocity:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
> host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
Not to my knownledge.
$ apt-cache show host
Package: host
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-Size: 164
Maintainer: Thom
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:44:19AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
i seem to recall seeing that nslookup
Rus Foster wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gary Turner wrote:
>
>> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
>> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
>> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
>
>Its in the "host" package
>
>rg
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:44 -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
>
> Running Sarge.
Hi,
I hate it when tha
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
>
> Running Sarge.
> --
> gt [EMAIL PROTEC
"stanb" == stanb writes:
stanb> I've been ignoring the message for a while, but "may be
stanb> removed" part of it caught my eye today.
stanb> Wjy exactly is nslookup being depricated? Is this a Debian
stanb> only thing? My FreeBSD machines are not complaining.
See
http
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:51:58PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I think this is an isc.org decision. use /usr/bin/host, it provides
> the same functionality with a better interface, IMHO.
Better command-line interface, anyhow. AFAICT, it doesn't have an
interactive interface on par with nsloo
also sprach stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.24.1843 +0200]:
> I've been ignoring the message for a while, but "may be removed" part of it
> caught my eye today.
>
> Wjy exactly is nslookup being depricated? Is this a Debian only thing? My
> FreeBSD machines are not complaining.
I think this is
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Nicolas Lamirault wrote:
>
> > Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19
> > +0100 :
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I'm having a little problem:
> > > In which debian-package do I find "nslookup" and
Nicolas Lamirault wrote:
> Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19
> +0100 :
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm having a little problem:
> > In which debian-package do I find "nslookup" and "host"?
> >
> > Forgot to install this when I installed Debian.
>
> dnsutils :
>
Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19 +0100
:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having a little problem:
> In which debian-package do I find "nslookup" and "host"?
>
> Forgot to install this when I installed Debian.
dnsutils :
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents
Cheryl Homiak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Which package provides nslookup?
dnsutils
nslookup is considered deprecated and the use of dig, which is also in
dnsutils, is preferred.
Gordon
PS: Try http://packages.debian.org - it offers a search by file in all
packages
--
Gordon Fraser
> Using nslookup also fails, on sourceforge.net or any name:
>
> *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.1.1: No information
> *** Default servers are not available
>
> What could be wrong with my Debian configuration that cvs and nslookup can't
> resolve anything?
This message do
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:42:32AM -0700, Greg Wiley wrote:
> This message appears when I run Woody's nslookup:
>
> Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> consider using the 'dig' or 'host' programs instead. Run nslookup with
> the '-si[lent]' option to prev
Am 22. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Martin F Krafft so:
> second: host and nslookup are DNS utilities, so they don't give a
> flying food about /etc/hosts. as you said, ping and telnet work fine,
> so your systems are good. nslookup and host both always contact the
> DNS server, never look into /etc/hosts.
first, your mailer send an incorrect email address:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
you might want to add that extra 'e'!
second: host and nslookup are DNS utilities, so they don't give a
flying food about /etc/hosts. as you said, ping and telnet work fine,
so your systems are good. nslookup and host both
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 05:02:11PM +0200, Kalle Hasselstr?m wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 07:49:28AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Kalle Hasselstr?m wrote:
> > > What package contaisn nslookup? Is there a command that lists all
> > > packages that supply command
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Kalle Hasselström wrote:
>What package contaisn nslookup? Is there a command that lists all
dnsutils
>packages that supply command (or file) foo?
apt-cache search foo
will sometimes do the trick. I personally use the bottom search engine on
http://www.debian.org/distrib/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 07:49:28AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Kalle Hasselstr?m wrote:
> > What package contaisn nslookup? Is there a command that lists all
> > packages that supply command (or file) foo?
>
> Try -
> $ apt-cache search nslookup
[cut]
That's what
Hi Kalle,
You can go to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages to lookup
pacages that contain the file foo.
HTH,
Jim Richards
Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any
copyright law on the planet.--Mark Twain
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at
Kalle Hasselström wrote:
>
> What package contaisn nslookup? Is there a command that lists all
> packages that supply command (or file) foo?
>
i think it is in dnsutils
--
Nicolas LAMIRAULT
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Kalle Hasselstr?m wrote:
> What package contaisn nslookup? Is there a command that lists all
> packages that supply command (or file) foo?
Try -
$ apt-cache search nslookup
and
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
It's "dnsutils" in potato.
hth,
kent
-
"V.Suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which package in debian is equivalent to nslookup in redhat/suse?
> nslookup gives the ip address of a given website.
It's part of the dnsutils package
Glyn
--
so here we are then
http://members.tripod.
"V.Suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which package in debian is equivalent to nslookup in redhat/suse?
> nslookup gives the ip address of a given website.
Sorry about last post - half-asleeo and didn't realise that _lots_ of
people responded already
Glyn
--
so
Try "dig", which I believe is in the dnsutils package.
Liam
On 15 May 2001, at 12:14, V.Suresh wrote:
> which package in debian is equivalent to nslookup in redhat/suse?
> nslookup gives the ip address of a given website.
>
> -V.Suresh. Sureshvuserssourceforgenet
>Http://w
On Tue, 15 May 2001, V.Suresh wrote:
> which package in debian is equivalent to nslookup in redhat/suse?
> nslookup gives the ip address of a given website.
>
dnsutils
Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars
on the road
On Tue, 15 May 2001, V.Suresh wrote:
> which package in debian is equivalent to nslookup in redhat/suse?
> nslookup gives the ip address of a given website.
>
nslookup may be found in the "dnsutils" package. :)
Cheers,
Kris
--
Kristian Rink
::bits :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::phone:: 0174 5360871
::
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:47:54AM +0200, dko wrote:
> i have the unstable on my station
> when i install dnsutils, it says dnsutils doesn't exist anymore and rblcheck
> host replace it.
> i installed rblcheck and host but i'm still unable to launch nslookup
Note that replace != provide. You will
Hi,
my experience with unstable is that almost nothing exists, despite the
Contents file. You might try to edit your apt sources list to testing or
stable, run apt-get update and try to install dnsutils again.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, dko wrote:
> i have the unstable on my statio
They are in the dnsutils and traceroute packages respectively.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Schuetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:42 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: 'nslookup', 'traceroute' in debian
My machine --running potato-- claimed not to
"Tom Schuetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My machine --running potato-- claimed not to know either nslookup or
> traceroute. No man pages, either.
>
> Are there Debian equivalents to these commands?
Yes, try the following:
% apt-cache search nslookup
dnsutils - Utilities for Querying DNS Server
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Jay Barbee wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> >
> > > Sure I mean broken because the man page says you can do 'nslookup
> > > home.netscape.com' but in fact you can't. You have to run 'nslookup' and
> > > at the '>' prompt type your query. Annoying, isn'
> On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>
> > Sure I mean broken because the man page says you can do 'nslookup
> > home.netscape.com' but in fact you can't. You have to run 'nslookup' and
> > at the '>' prompt type your query. Annoying, isn't it? (It's been this
> > way as long as I can re
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> Sure I mean broken because the man page says you can do 'nslookup
> home.netscape.com'
> but in fact you can't. You have to run 'nslookup' and at the '>' prompt type
> your
> query. Annoying, isn't it? (It's been this way as long as I can remember b
> > > If I simply type 'nslookup' and hit enter to get the ">" and then type
> > > in my Linux box spits the information I wanted originally.
> > > My resolve.conf has "nameserver 127.0.0.1 ".
> >
> > I have a running DNS, but when I tried to point the nameserver to
> > 127.0.0.1, it also gave
Seams to work fine on RH5.0
mark
On 03-Jun-98 Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jay Barbee wrote:
>
>> > Yeah, the nslookup (or its manpage) is broken. You always have to go into
>> > interactive mode. Yuck. Anyway you should try dig, it's fancier. I think
>> > it comes in dns-utils.
>>
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Steve Mayer wrote:
smayer> That's funny. I don't have a problem issuing nslookup home.netscape.com
smayer> on my latest hamm machine.
smayer>
smayer> On the other hand, on an up to date bo machine, I get the same problem
smayer> you list (the dropping to the nslookup prompt).
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jay Barbee wrote:
..
sysjyb> If I simply type 'nslookup' and hit enter to get the ">" and then type
in
sysjyb> my Linux box spits the information I wanted originally. My
sysjyb> resolve.conf has "nameserver 127.0.0.1 ".
sysjyb>
sysjyb> Why can I not simply type 'nslooku
>> "JBJ" == Jens B Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JBJ> Sure I mean broken because the man page says you can do 'nslookup
JBJ> home.netscape.com'
JBJ> but in fact you can't. You have to run 'nslookup' and at the '>'
JBJ> prompt type your
JBJ> query. Annoying, isn't it? (It's been this way
That's funny. I don't have a problem issuing nslookup home.netscape.com
on my latest hamm machine.
On the other hand, on an up to date bo machine, I get the same problem
you list (the dropping to the nslookup prompt). Upon further
investigation, nslookup is a symlink to nslookup.sh which seems t
Sure I mean broken because the man page says you can do 'nslookup
home.netscape.com'
but in fact you can't. You have to run 'nslookup' and at the '>' prompt type
your
query. Annoying, isn't it? (It's been this way as long as I can remember but
no, I
haven't logged a bug report.)
Jay Barbee wrot
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998, Jay Barbee wrote:
> > Yeah, the nslookup (or its manpage) is broken. You always have to go into
> > interactive mode. Yuck. Anyway you should try dig, it's fancier. I think
> > it comes in dns-utils.
>
> Hummm, I will try dig, no problem... but could you explain what you mean
> Yeah, the nslookup (or its manpage) is broken. You always have to go into
> interactive mode. Yuck. Anyway you should try dig, it's fancier. I think
> it comes in dns-utils.
Hummm, I will try dig, no problem... but could you explain what you mean by
"broken". Is it some problem with they way I
Yeah, the nslookup (or its manpage) is broken. You always have to go into
interactive mode. Yuck. Anyway you should try dig, it's fancier. I think it
comes
in dns-utils.
Jay Barbee wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have kind of a strange situation on my home system.
>
> I have named running for my home ne
Maurizio Marini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > edu
> nslookup try to resolve edu (or any othe d1^ level domain)
> appending your default domain to edu:
> edu.aaa.bbb.com does not exist
>
> So, you have to close edu with a dot:
> > edu.
>
> and you will get what you expect to get.
No, this is t
"Susan G. Kleinmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Using the latest versions of libc6, netbase and netstd 2.17-1,
> and dnsutils 8.1.1-2, I can't seem to get nslookup working.
> The error message is
>*** Can't find server name for address 127.0.0.1: Server failed
Are you running BIND on your
On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> Using the latest versions of libc6, netbase and netstd 2.17-1,
> and dnsutils 8.1.1-2, I can't seem to get nslookup working.
> The error message is
>*** Can't find server name for address 127.0.0.1: Server failed
I've been using this set of pa
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before that, I would recommend to change 127.0.0.1 to the address of
> some different nameserver though. You shoud not run your own NS without
> real need.
Depends. If you're running over a slow link, bind's DNS lookup
caching can help speed up networ
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Tony Koehn wrote:
> I do have nameserver 127.0.0.1 in my /etc/resolv.conf file.
If you are quering bind at 127.0.0.1, bind *must* resolve
1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa. in localhost.
This is done enabling "localhost entry" when configuring bind.
Ciao
-
> I do have nameserver 127.0.0.1 in my /etc/resolv.conf file.
>
Then you have to make sure your nameserver is installed, properly
configured and _running_. Check /usr/doc/bind for documentation.
Before that, I would recommend to change 127.0.0.1 to the address of
some different nameserver though
I do have nameserver 127.0.0.1 in my /etc/resolv.conf file.
--
> From: Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tony Koehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: NSLOOKUP don't work
> Date: Monday, Jul
On Mon, 14 Jul 1997, Tony Koehn wrote:
> After getting debian installed I tried to do a nslookup and I get this
> message:
>
> *** Can't find server name for address 127.0.0.1: Non-existent host.domain
> *** Default servers are not available.
>
> What did I do wrong?
You have to enable localhos
On Mon, 14 Jul 1997, Tony Koehn wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> My /etc/hosts file does have 127.0.0.1 localhost in it.
> My /etc/host.conf has "order hosts,bind" in it.
>
> Tony
<>
> > Tony Koehn wrote:
> > :After getting debian installed I tried to do a nslookup and I get this
> > :message:
> > :
> > :*
o substitute 122.122.122.122 for the address of
your nameserver (127.0.0.1 if you are running it on your machine).
Alex Y.
>
>
>
> --
> > From: Thomas Baetzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Tony Koehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: NSLO
Thomas,
My /etc/hosts file does have 127.0.0.1 localhost in it.
My /etc/host.conf has "order hosts,bind" in it.
Tony
--
> From: Thomas Baetzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tony Koehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: NSLOOKUP don't work
> Date: M
On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Gith wrote:
> > However, to get it to work with nslookup, add one of the following
> > lines to /var/named/named.local:
> >
> > [...deleted...]
> >
> > remember to update (increment) the serial number in both files, and
> > get named to reload its database with 'ndc reload'.
>
On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> this won't help nslookup at all. nslookup is specifically a DNS lookup
> tool, not a generic hostname resolver - it does a name-server lookup.
>
> it will however, help any program that uses the resolver library to
> resolve host names (i.e. just ab
On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Thought wrote:
> edit your /etc/hosts and put mybox on the line with 127.0.0.1
>
> it should then look something like:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.quicklink.net mybox
this won't help nslookup at all. nslookup is specifically a DNS lookup
tool, not a generic
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
