Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 24 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
Correct, I have lpr.
I have the impression that the support for piping the print job to lpr
(or an equivalent command) has been removed or at least reduced
significantly. I initially suspected this when I saw that iceweasel no
longer
On 25 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> You could always print to the same file, e.g. /tmp/mozilla.ps, and run a
> script in the background that waits for the presence of this file, sends
> it to your spooler of choice, and removes the file afterwards.
>
> The manpage of inotifywait (package in
On 06/25/2008 05:48 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jun 25 02:20 -0500]:
This is a retrograde development. A principal advantage of Linux has
always been that you had a wide choice, but this restricts choice. It
seems that I must either use CUPS, which I do
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:18:03 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > Correct, I have lpr.
> >
> > I have the impression that the support for piping the print job to lpr
> > (or an equivalent command) has been removed or at least reduced
> > significantly.
On 25 Jun 2008, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jun 25 02:20 -0500]:
>
> > This is a retrograde development. A principal advantage of Linux has
> > always been that you had a wide choice, but this restricts choice. It
> > seems that I must either use CUPS, which
* Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jun 25 02:20 -0500]:
> This is a retrograde development. A principal advantage of Linux has
> always been that you had a wide choice, but this restricts choice. It
> seems that I must either use CUPS, which I don't want to do, or print to
> file and the
On 24 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > Correct, I have lpr.
>
> I have the impression that the support for piping the print job to lpr
> (or an equivalent command) has been removed or at least reduced
> significantly. I initially suspected this when I saw that iceweasel no
> longer opens the KD
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 17:35:26 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:05:05 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > > Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > >> The version of iceweasel in Unstable will only print to a file; no
> > >> printers are list
On 24 Jun 2008, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:05:05 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >> The version of iceweasel in Unstable will only print to a file; no
> >> printers are listed. This is probably an upstream bug in iceweasel
> >> because Google show
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:05:05 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
>> The version of iceweasel in Unstable will only print to a file; no
>> printers are listed. This is probably an upstream bug in iceweasel
>> because Google shows that people using other distros have got it to
Anthony Campbell wrote:
The version of iceweasel in Unstable will only print to a file; no
printers are listed. This is probably an upstream bug in iceweasel
because Google shows that people using other distros have got it too.
Anyone know a way of fixing this? I have tried editing the print stu
11 matches
Mail list logo
