On 01/02/2016 10:06 AM, Glenn English wrote:
Beats me, but it's working.
I modified the line in /etc/exports (all on one line) to:
/home/ghe/Finances
192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
That isn't exactly as suggested, but there were mild complaints about
not havin
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote:
>
> I would return the server's idmapd.conf back to the default
> configuration (nobody:nogroup) and make sure that the idmapd service
> is running on both the server and the client. Make sure the domain
> matches in idmapd.conf on both the se
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Pier wrote:
>
> It was ages I didn't write to the list but nfs always arouse curiosity ;)
> First try to force nfsv3 to see if permissions are ok (v3 uses numeric
> uid/gid) with 'mount -o vers=3'.
> If this works and you want to use nfsv4 then make sure the config
> On Jan 2, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
>
> 1) Ditch webmin, I don't know what it is but it seems to break
> something that should be pretty simple to set up, without giving any
> feedback.
Webmin's one of those web-based GUI admin things. I use it because it usually
does well, a
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> Come on folks!
>
> Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
> hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
> computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
>
> OK. Leave out (date) and (%
On Friday, 1 January 2016, 21:57, Glenn English wrote:
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hun
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:56 PM, ghe wrote:
> I changed the nobody name to myself (ghe) in /etc/idmapd.conf, and created a
> new user (gheqw). Now ls says the directory on the client is owned by
> gheqw:nogroup. That doesn't make any sense to me at all.
I would return the server's idmapd.conf bac
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hungover), and tell me what I've done wrong...
> On Dec 31, 20
Strangely, putting a dns for the local zone (and forwarder for the rest)
improves the situation.
No cannot monitor in kern.log anymore ...
De : Bob Proulx
À : debian-user@lists.debian.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 20 Septembre 2011 21h46
Objet : Re: nfs problem
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have messages like this in logs:
> lockd cannot monitor ip_address
> and also messages about statd
The lockd: cannot monitor messages are due to the kernel being unable
to communicate with the rpc.statd process. That usually indicates
that the rpc.statd is not runnin
Kurian Thayil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash
> in /etc/exports of B. It will be like,
>
> /home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
>
> You will be able to read-write as root if you include this
> option.
This did not really w
Hi,
If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash in
/etc/exports of B. It will be like,
/home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
You will be able to read-write as root if you include this option.
Regards,
Kurian Mathew Thayil.
On 10/30/08, Mirco Piccin
Hi,
> Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules
> blocking any kind of traffic A<-->B.
> I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point
> on A, read-write.
> I can read the contents of /home/storage/video on B. But I cannot
> write anything to it. I keep g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And thanks also to Matthew M. -- sorry Matthew.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIkNNElNlJzOkJmTcRAi6IAJ92a316VPCAh0E47K4+J6wadeBCbgCggba9
GThDY5qkC/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Samad put me on the right track to the solution. See comments in
line below.
>> Other factors which may have a bearing on the situation: the BDS
>> computer is a P4; whereas the SOL is a dual core on a Foxconn
>> motherboard. Several other t
some thoughts inline
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
> rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
> he (and others?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As Matthew Moore suggested, after reading the relevant manual page to
see what command exportfs -r does, I ran on the server machine (SOL)
exportfs -rv, which returned the following:
exporting 192.168.0.0/24:/home/ken/mozilla
exporting 192.168.0.0/24:
Hello,
You might try running
$ exportfs -r
on the host computer.
MM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
he (and others?) could help me. So, here is the information he asked me
for, as well as the output of the "st
Le lundi 28 juillet 2008, Ken Heard a écrit :
> I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user
> B. I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's
> computer, and vice versa.
>
> So, in each computer I amended
>
> 1) file /etc/exports to export the relative
Ding Honghui wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nfs server 192.168.110.28
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home
/etc/exports
/home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash)
nfs clien
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
> /etc/hosts
They won't need to be if you use DNS. But it is acceptable to list
them in the local files. Local files override network DNS.
> if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis table to be useful)
> everything is f
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:47:14PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
> /etc/hosts if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis
> table to be useful) everything is find.
>
> Nevertheless I don t understand how the nfs can make a
> resolution via dns of
--- Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > client <-> server <-X-> internet
> >
> > That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
> > clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
> > I have read that client and server must be able to
> > make a reverse resolut
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> client <-> server <-X-> internet
>
> That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
> clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
> I have read that client and server must be able to
> make a reverse resolution of the client and the
> server, but I am not sure of it a
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> --- Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ?crit
> > > > > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> > If the server has
> > > > > > not access to internet, they cannot mount
> > their directories !
> > >
> > I think wh
--- Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx
> wrote:
> > Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > > Of course the network connexion is good !
> > > I can ping the server
> >
> > But you said that the server cannot access the
> network:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > Of course the network connexion is good !
> > I can ping the server
>
> But you said that the server cannot access the network:
> > > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
> > > >
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> Of course the network connexion is good !
> I can ping the server
But you said that the server cannot access the network:
> > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
> > > not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories !
This is a
--- Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane
> Durieux wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> > If the server has not access to internet, they
> cannot
> > mount their directories !
>
> in what way
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> Hello
>
> I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> If the server has not access to internet, they cannot
> mount their directories !
in what way is network access broken?
>
> I have checked /etc/fstab
> nfs server is re
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Michael Gass wrote:
I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot.
I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram
(Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network
card and no cdrom.
<.>
"nfs: serve
BTW, is there still a way to mount a windows dirtree via nfs ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:01:06 -0500, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I
> am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box)
> is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and
> also I can t
On Monday 27 October 2003 22:01, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other
> machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says
> (Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux
> box from there and also I can telnet ot it.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:39:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Thanks. Does sid's 1.0.5-1 work?
Yes, seems to be working for me.
--
Dave Carrigan
Seattle, WA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ | ICQ:161669680
UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 12:08, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
>
> > > Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
> > > downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
>
> > # dpkg -l | grep nfs
> > ii nfs-c
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> > Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
> > downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
> # dpkg -l | grep nfs
> ii nfs-common 1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve
> i
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
> > Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> > mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> > receive; errno = Connection refused". An
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
> Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
> anything either, thats why I f
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 05:31, gerard wrote:
> Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
> anything either, thats why I find it strang
Bart Lenoir wrote:
Hi,
I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat.
Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian
which I want to use as an NFS client.
Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine.
Mount and Umount is working well, however
I don't have access to the selected directory.
"Permission denied". The only
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:52:20 -0600
Dimitri Maziuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are
> > owed by nobody.nobody
> >
> > once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2
* Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are owed
> by nobody.nobody
>
> once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2.20 files appear as own by
> nobody.nogroup
>
> But with kernel 2.4.17 files appear with
Nicolas Lamirault said:
> hi debian users
> somebody have an idea to correct me in my config ?
> thanks
sounds like a permissions issue. what userid are you
trying to view the files as? either make sure that
that userid(the numerical id) has access to those files
or turn on the no_root_squash opt
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:05:44PM +0200, Alexander Gun uttered:
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-13
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.13.100
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.13.100
>
Make sure nfs-
Thanks for your help!
I was my fault that it didn't work. I made a mistake
when I tied to mount the nfs because I didn't enter the same directory that I
had int the other computer in the /etc/exports. That's why it didn't work.
Thanks again!
Robert
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Jens B.
> Use a FQDN instead of IP. For some reason it seems /etc/exports doesn't like
> IPs.
my /etc/exports (excerpts):
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported
# / 152.30.5.6 (rw)
/ 152.30.5.2 (rw,root_squash,map_daemon)
/home/elentari 152.30.5.2 (rw, no_r
Use a FQDN instead of IP. For some reason it seems /etc/exports doesn't like
IPs.
Horvath Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might be dumb but I have installed the nfs-server package and my
> /etc/exports is as follows on the computer 152.66.73.163:
>
> # /etc/exports: the access control list for filesys
49 matches
Mail list logo
