"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 02:48:59AM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
>> memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
>> volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
>>
>
> The
marko...@eunet.rs writes:
> Maybe you have "noauto" option?
Nope.
--
Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 02:48:59AM +0200, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
> memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
> volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
>
The OOM process killer is not necessarily aw
Maybe you have "noauto" option?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140921053558.GA3731@debian
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 03:44:53AM -0400, Timothy Ball wrote:
> I would like to tone down repeative disk usage and would like to share
> /usr/share via nfs... can anyone think of reasons this would be a bad
> idea?
This would be a good idea (why do you think it's called _share_?),
but it won't wor
> >
> > I posted this on comp.linux.os.networking and didn't get any
> > responses. I'm hoping somebody here might be able to help.
> >
> >
> > I want to backup my laptop (thinkpad-wireless) to the tape drive in my
> > server (bear).
>
> Not sure why your nfs isn't working but I'd suggest trying du
On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 06:25, Bob Koss wrote:
>
> I posted this on comp.linux.os.networking and didn't get any
> responses. I'm hoping somebody here might be able to help.
>
>
> I want to backup my laptop (thinkpad-wireless) to the tape drive in my
> server (bear).
Not sure why your nfs isn't w
*Grasps at straws*
That all looks good to me. How about /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts?
*Reaches into a hat*
It may just be that sometimes your card switches it's type of transmit
mode when the first few packets go out. My notebook card spams my
console/syslog with a few lines when it switches,
> The kernel should take care of the routing. What is your
> /etc/network/interfaces file look like? Just trying to probe to find a
> possible answer for you.
Here it is:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 171.64.93.186
network 171.64.93.0
The kernel should take care of the routing. What is your
/etc/network/interfaces file look like? Just trying to probe to find a
possible answer for you.
--mike
On 07 Aug 2001 10:12:12 -0700, Max Kamenetsky wrote:
> * Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 10:06] wrote:
> > Is this a dh
* Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 10:06] wrote:
> Is this a dhcp or static machine? I'm wondering if a default route is
> missing before the first mount and gets put in right afterwards. Sounds
> odd with the drivers compiled in. What card is it?
It's a static machine with a 3C
* Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 09:59] wrote:
> Are your network drivers compiled in or modules? If modules are they
> autoloaded in /etc/modules?
They're compiled in. I can see the network starting up way before the
portmapper and NFS mount requests are issued. Besides, the
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV said:
> > Is there any way to set an NFS timeout so it only tries for, say, five
> > seconds? Or anything else I can do to allow root logins to the clients
> > when the server is down? Otherwise, I have to power cycle and wait for
> > fsck...
>
> From man
Adam C Powell IV said:
> Is there any way to set an NFS timeout so it only tries for, say, five
> seconds? Or anything else I can do to allow root logins to the clients
> when the server is down? Otherwise, I have to power cycle and wait for
> fsck...
From man mount, under the heading "Mount opt
> "joost" == joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
joost> In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Rob Duncan
joost> wrote:
>> I'm having some problems mounting with NFS. The baffling thing
>> is that the client machine (aidan) can happily mount two other
>> d
In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Rob Duncan wrote:
> I'm having some problems mounting with NFS. The baffling thing is
> that the client machine (aidan) can happily mount two other
> directories from the server (miles), but consistently balks on this
> one. Here's what I start with
Hi!
Some time ago you posted a question on debian-user list regarding Debian
NFS setup. There seems to be no useful follow-ups on the problem.
I am in similar situation. I'm trying to set up a server with seven
clients. Home directories are NFS mounted - that's easy part.
I also want clients to f
On Sun, 3 Nov 1996, Stan Brown wrote:
> I can't get my FreeBSD box to mount ny Linux machines disks.
> My HP's can mount then just fine. Can anyone think of anything that
> might be different about the Linux NFS implemetation ? The FreeBSD
> man page talks about privleged and non-privliged p
18 matches
Mail list logo
