On 2005-12-22 15:07:50, Gerwin Bruner wrote:
> The only thing which is not working is to get nlockmgr onto port 4001.
> Is there any way to change the port? What did I miss out?
I think I successfully used sysctl for this once.
Felix
--
Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any sufficiently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:01:09AM +0200, Sebastian Ritter wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> >
> > > Hai,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:01:09AM +0200, Sebastian Ritter wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
>
> > Hai,
> >
> > I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
> > It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
> > outgoing ethernet.
'''
> You c
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 08:23:08PM -0500, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > Hai,
> >
> > I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
> > It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
> > outgoing ethernet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> Hai,
>
> I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
> It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
> outgoing ethernet.
>
> I am trying hard to read up to this sub
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hai,
>
> I'm trying to secure my system, I ran pmfirewall and some tests.
> It seems that rpc.mountd still listens on port 1024 even on the
> outgoing ethernet.
>
> I am trying hard to read up to this subject, but in the time being
> I
6 matches
Mail list logo
