Re: new kernel not installing

1999-01-04 Thread Art Lemasters
Actually, kernel-package and make-kpkg did a good job of getting kernel 2.1.132 installed here. The way these kernels are going into /boot is a good thing, too, IMO, although I needed to make link afterward ( but maybe I only had to do that because I made a mistake with this system in the pas

Re: new kernel not installing

1999-01-04 Thread Art Lemasters
Tom, take a look at vmlinuz in the "/" directory. Then look at "/boot/vmlinuz-2.1.125." See what I mean? You might try symlinking from /vmlinuz (after renaming or removing it) to /boot/vmlinuz-2.1.125, if it's there as my 2.1.132 kernel is. ...not sure about 2.1.125, but it might be a goo

Re: new kernel not installing

1999-01-04 Thread Bob Nielsen
Does 'make install' put vmlinuz where lilo expects it to be? You might install kernel-package and use 'make-kpkg' to compile the kernel and create a .deb which you can install. This works quite nicely. Bob On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Tom wrote: > I am trying to upgrade from 2.0.36 to 2.1.125. After c