Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Xu wrote the following on 10.04.2007 07:09:
>
>
>
>> | net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
>
> this might be worth a try.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/
YES ! That's it !
After setting net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling to zero, everything just works
no
William Xu wrote the following on 10.04.2007 07:09:
> | net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
this might be worth a try.
http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/
Do the working machines have the same value in net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling?
> Oh, his machine is unreachable for me currently..
>
>> ...and just
Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Folkert wrote the following on 09.04.2007 20:27:
>
>
>
>>> you said you can ping google.com?
>>> -> name resolution works
>>
>> I doubt it. Unless he has a /etc/hosts entry for it.
>>
>> I believe his /etc/resolv.conf is screwed.
>
> After thinking abo
Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hmm
> let us summarize
>
> you are able to establish http connections via telnet?
> (you received the plain html code in terminal?)
http is only possible when i use a proxy. Currently i've set http_proxy
to a neighbour machine, namely http://192.168.60.111:
Greg Folkert wrote the following on 09.04.2007 20:27:
>> you said you can ping google.com?
>> -> name resolution works
>
> I doubt it. Unless he has a /etc/hosts entry for it.
>
> I believe his /etc/resolv.conf is screwed.
After thinking about it that would explain this curiosity but then he
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 16:33 +0200, Thilo Six wrote:
> William Xu wrote the following on 09.04.2007 14:22:
>
> > This doesn't work for me.
> hmm
> let us summarize
>
> you are able to establish http connections via telnet?
> (you received the plain html code in terminal?)
>
> you said you can pin
William Xu wrote the following on 09.04.2007 14:22:
> This doesn't work for me.
hmm
let us summarize
you are able to establish http connections via telnet?
(you received the plain html code in terminal?)
you said you can ping google.com?
-> name resolution works
your mtu looks fine
..but yo
Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> quote from first mail:
> <---
> The problem is that i'm unable to connect to the internet
> directly (execpt for google, weird..)
> --->
>
> so it seems t
William wrote the following on 08.04.2007 06:11:
> This looks fine too.
>
> ,
> | ~$ telnet google.com 80
> | Trying 64.233.167.99...
> | Connected to google.com.
> | Escape character is '^]'.
> | GET / HTTP/1.1\r
> | GET / HTTP/1.1\r
> | ^D
> |
> | ^Z
> |
> | Connection closed by foreign h
> Exactly. If ping works, then internet works. Looks to me like it is a
> firewall or router problem. Blocking port 80 perhaps?
also could be a problem with mtu. so an output of /sbin/ifconfig would be
interesting.
Here are the outputs of ifconfig:
,[ sudo ifconfig ]
| eth0 Link e
2007/4/6, Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Jollans wrote:
> William Xu wrote:
>> The problem is that i'm unable to connect to the internet
>> directly(execpt for google, weird..). ping, dns, traceroute, netstate
>> all look fine.
>
> this paragra
2007/4/6, Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
basically to test if http is possibly from this machine someone could do:
$ telnet google.com 80
GET / HTTP/1.1\r
This looks fine too.
,
| ~$ telnet google.com 80
| Trying 64.233.167.99...
| Connected to google.com.
| Escape character is '^]'.
| GE
Thilo Six wrote the following on 06.04.2007 13:30:
> Joe Hart wrote the following on 06.04.2007 13:08:
>
>
>
>>> this paragraph is self-contradictory; Are your problems limited to the
>>> world wide web ? If so, have you tried using a different web browser ?
>
> maybe ipv6 activated in browser
Joe Hart wrote the following on 06.04.2007 13:08:
>> this paragraph is self-contradictory; Are your problems limited to the
>> world wide web ? If so, have you tried using a different web browser ?
maybe ipv6 activated in browser config?
>> Thomas
>
> Exactly. If ping works, then internet wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Jollans wrote:
> William Xu wrote:
>> The problem is that i'm unable to connect to the internet
>> directly(execpt for google, weird..). ping, dns, traceroute, netstate
>> all look fine.
>
> this paragraph is self-contradictory; Are your probl
William Xu wrote:
> The problem is that i'm unable to connect to the internet
> directly(execpt for google, weird..). ping, dns, traceroute, netstate
> all look fine.
this paragraph is self-contradictory; Are your problems limited to the
world wide web ? If so, have you tried using a different we
16 matches
Mail list logo
