Re: network card problem

catbugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And when multiple Debian Developers are to be seen as untrustable, Speaking of "untrustable", you do yourself no favours when you use sock puppets. It's entirely transparent that you are one person posting under several different names; within the past 24 hou

Re: network card problem

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:34:02 +0200 Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [.. half a book deleted that aimed to help Ahmed on the wrong list ..] But smart as cookies like Erich are, the main reason for the posting as follows: > Please ignore the post by Luipher Fhang. This is not even his rea

Re: network card problem

probably mii-tool will tell you something about the card. ifconfig -a reports any nic errors? run tcpdump -n -i to see what hapens. Also, if you are using a hub try to "force" all things attached to the hub to "10mb half" (no autonegotiate). Jon Miller wrote: >Recently I had to replace a mother

Re: Network card problem

Hi Dimi! On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dimi wrote: > I tried to install the Debian > Woody . The > installation was succesfull. But I cannot install my network card . It > is not in the list where you can choose the network card. And I tried > also som

Re: Network card problem

> My Network Card is a D-Link DFE-550 TX. 8139too? > > I tried to find the driver and I found it several times. Also from the > webpage of D-Link. But they were not comipled . So I compiled them in > Linux and than I wanted to add them in the list (I don't know the > correct technical words for t

Re: network card problem

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 08:34, Richard Weil wrote: > You don't happen to remember the name of the utility > do you? I found a few possible suspects on the 3com > website -- I'm not sure which of them, if any, will do > the job. Thanks. It's the disk with the dos drivers for the 3com 3c509x cards.

Re: network card problem

You don't happen to remember the name of the utility do you? I found a few possible suspects on the 3com website -- I'm not sure which of them, if any, will do the job. Thanks. Richard --- hmike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 19:59, Richard Weil wrote: > > I tried this and sti

Re: network card problem

On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 19:59, Richard Weil wrote: > I tried this and still no progress ... I think the > problem must be from the cards using the same I/O > address. I noticed that on bootup, before the first of > two error messages related to eth1, it says: > > SIOCSIFADDR > > and then before the

Re: network card problem

I tried this and still no progress ... I think the problem must be from the cards using the same I/O address. I noticed that on bootup, before the first of two error messages related to eth1, it says: SIOCSIFADDR and then before the 2nd error: SIOCSIFNETMASK COuld this give an indication to the

Re: network card problem

Hi, Richard I don't know if it could help you but I got the same problem to put my second nic recognized by the kernel 2.2.19. By default, the kernel would only use one nic (eth0) . I said by "default" this means the feature . That was I learned from few month

Re: network card problem

I installed the 3c5x9utils package as suggested and I think it's indicating the problem, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results (or what to do about it). I run the diagnostic and it finds both cards. The output is approx.: Generating the activation sequence on port 0x100 for card 1 Activati

Re: network card problem

On Monday 12 November 2001 10:51 am, Richard Weil wrote: > I just installed a second network card in a machine in > which the first card runs fine. Both cards are old > 3Com 3c509b cards. I added the second card to > /etc/network/interfaces with an address and netmask, > but I can't get the machine

Re: Network card problem

At 11:36 PM 11/4/01 +0100, you wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 14:32, Raphael Bustin wrote: > As it turns out, the file rtl8139.o exists on my > debian/potato box, in at least one or two places. Which Chip is it? Realtek 8139 or 8129? If you have the 8139 you could/should use the 8139too # drive

Re: Network card problem

Paul Deniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to install via http w/ a cable modem. My problem is that > I've installed base using floppies but my card (a d-link DFE-530TX+) is > not supported in the drivers disks. My card did come w/ a disk w/ linux > drivers on it, but I have to compil

Re: Network card problem

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 14:32, Raphael Bustin wrote: > As it turns out, the file rtl8139.o exists on my > debian/potato box, in at least one or two places. Which Chip is it? Realtek 8139 or 8129? If you have the 8139 you could/should use the 8139too # driver for ethernet card with Realtek chipset

Re: Network card problem

At 01:47 PM 11/4/01 -0500, Paul Deniston wrote: RESEND of previous html message: I'm trying to install via http w/ a cable modem. My problem is that I've installed base using floppies but my card (a d-link DFE-530TX+) is not supported in the drivers disks. My card did come w/ a disk w/ linux d

RE: network card problem

Thanks for the reply. Here is the output of dmesg: Linux version 2.2.14 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.2 2116 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #1 Mon Feb 21 11:50:24 CST 2000 Detected 90206997 Hz processor. Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 35.94 BogoMIPS Memory: 79328k/81920k a

RE: network card problem

Arghh, I haven't had to wonder experiences with this card. Can you ping the IP you assigned to that interface? Is there anything in the syslog? Are the debug options you can provide to insmod via-rhine.o ? Do you have link lights? Just some random ideas... On 27-Feb-2000 Russ Cook wrote: > My

Re: network card problem

"Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jonathan P Tomer wrote: > > > > i'm installing two new pcs at work, one with solaris x86 and one with debian > > so that i can show my employer how much nicer debian is. unfortunately > > there is one major problem: the hamm cd i have is not success

Re: network card problem

Jonathan P Tomer wrote: > > i'm installing two new pcs at work, one with solaris x86 and one with debian > so that i can show my employer how much nicer debian is. unfortunately > there is one major problem: the hamm cd i have is not successfully detecting > the ne2k (well, encore enl832tx, which