On Ma, 05 iul 11, 18:13:06, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> The primary reasons are 1) reliability separate from your ISP and 2) verified
> correct results without NXDOMAIN spam and other such things.
[...]
> Please believe point 2 is based in verified and somewhat commonly-known fact,
> and not pa
On Tue 05 Jul 2011 at 18:13:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> The primary reasons are 1) reliability separate from your ISP and 2) verified
> correct results without NXDOMAIN spam and other such things. For 1, although
> your ISPs routers may be up their DNS may go down or become incorrectly
> co
On 07/05/11 at 11:18pm, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 05 Jul 2011 at 22:09:38 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > [snip recursive explanation]
>
> It was a really good explanation, wasn't it?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for this explanation, DNS is still a bit like dark magic to
> > me :)
>
> I suspect you ma
On Tue 05 Jul 2011 at 22:09:38 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> [snip recursive explanation]
It was a really good explanation, wasn't it?
>
> Thanks a lot for this explanation, DNS is still a bit like dark magic to
> me :)
I suspect you may be doing yourself an injustice. :)
> My understanding
On 07/05/11 at 10:09pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 02 iul 11, 12:23:39, William Hopkins wrote:
> > On 07/02/11 at 02:06pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Sb, 02 iul 11, 09:35:35, Erwan David wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's what I do : I have unbound locally for recursive, and it caches
> > > > f
On Sb, 02 iul 11, 12:23:39, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 07/02/11 at 02:06pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Sb, 02 iul 11, 09:35:35, Erwan David wrote:
> > >
> > > That's what I do : I have unbound locally for recursive, and it caches
> > > for the local network + bind for authoritative.
> >
> > No
On 07/02/11 at 02:06pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 02 iul 11, 09:35:35, Erwan David wrote:
> >
> > That's what I do : I have unbound locally for recursive, and it caches
> > for the local network + bind for authoritative.
>
> Not sure what "recursive" means [...]
Recursive queries are what a
On Sb, 02 iul 11, 09:35:35, Erwan David wrote:
>
> That's what I do : I have unbound locally for recursive, and it caches
> for the local network + bind for authoritative.
Not sure what "recursive" means, but dnsmasq shines on your gateway,
where it can provide DHCP too and make sure your local
On 01/07/11 23:21, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 07/02/11 at 12:01am, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Mi, 29 iun 11, 20:08:16, Brian wrote:
>>> On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 12:22:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>>>
For a good time, 'apt-get install bind' :-)
>>>
>>> For an even better time (and to escape
On Sat 02 Jul 2011 at 00:01:29 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> If caching is all you need then
>
> apt-get install dnsmasq
I quite like unbound's DNSSEC aspect.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On 07/02/11 at 12:01am, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 29 iun 11, 20:08:16, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 12:22:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> >
> > > For a good time, 'apt-get install bind' :-)
> >
> > For an even better time (and to escape the monoculture)
> >
> >apt-get install
On Mi, 29 iun 11, 20:08:16, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 12:22:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>
> > For a good time, 'apt-get install bind' :-)
>
> For an even better time (and to escape the monoculture)
>
>apt-get install unbound
If caching is all you need then
apt-get install
On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 16:36:51 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> Agreed, I was just replying to your monoculture comment.. running a local
> recursive server is still a great idea (and thread contribution). Sorry if I
> implied otherwise!
I didn't take it that way. You made a fair technical point a
On 06/29/11 at 08:44pm, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 15:27:53 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> > Monoculture is one thing, but that is not a comparable product. Unbound is
> > for
> > recursive-only, so you can't have your own zone.
>
> Within the context of the thread I thought it a go
On Jun 29, 2011, at 1:27 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> Also, the Debian package name for ISC BIND is bind9.
Good point, well taken. Oops...
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 15:27:53 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> Monoculture is one thing, but that is not a comparable product. Unbound is for
> recursive-only, so you can't have your own zone.
Within the context of the thread I thought it a good fit and worth a
mention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 06/29/11 at 08:08pm, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 12:22:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>
> > For a good time, 'apt-get install bind' :-)
>
> For an even better time (and to escape the monoculture)
>
>apt-get install unbound
Monoculture is one thing, but that is not a comparable p
On Wed 29 Jun 2011 at 12:22:26 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> For a good time, 'apt-get install bind' :-)
For an even better time (and to escape the monoculture)
apt-get install unbound
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:51 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/29/11 at 10:15am, ChadDavis wrote:
>> Not a big deal, but just made me think. Surely the name resolution
>> isn't that costly is it?
>
> Depends on latency and distance to your DNS server, how long it takes the DNS
> server to perform
On 06/29/11 at 10:15am, ChadDavis wrote:
> I notice that the following two invocations of netstat have
> drastically different execution times:
>
> netstat
>
> netstat -n
>
>
> When you just use numerical addresses, it executes almost instantly,
> but with the domain names and whatever you call
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:15:58 -0600, ChadDavis wrote:
> I notice that the following two invocations of netstat have drastically
> different execution times:
>
> netstat
>
> netstat -n
>
>
> When you just use numerical addresses, it executes almost instantly, but
> with the domain names and what
21 matches
Mail list logo
