Re: netmeeting server

2003-01-14 Thread Torrin
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:48:47AM -0700, Dean Allen Provins wrote: > The January issue of Linux Journal has an article in "Cooking with > Linux" about gnomemeeting (I believe that was the name) which is > supposed to "talk" to NetMeeting. You may find the information that > you require in that ar

Re: netmeeting server

2003-01-14 Thread Dean Allen Provins
Paulo: The January issue of Linux Journal has an article in "Cooking with Linux" about gnomemeeting (I believe that was the name) which is supposed to "talk" to NetMeeting. You may find the information that you require in that article, or by contacting its author, Marcel Gagne: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: netmeeting server

2003-01-14 Thread Jacob S .
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:52:17 + Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > anyone knows something similar to M$ netmeeting server in open > plataform (using H 323 I think?!?). TIA,Paulo Henrique Howdy Paulo, jacob:/ $ apt-ca

Re: netmeeting server

2003-01-14 Thread Klaus Thielking-Riechert
Paolo, On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:52:17PM +, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > anyone knows something similar to M$ netmeeting server in open plataform >(using H 323 I think?!?). > TIA,Paulo Henrique I don't know about the features of the M$ netmeeting ser

Re: Netmeeting clone (not gnomemeeting)

2002-04-10 Thread John
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:36:32PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > > >> Might I ask why you don't just try gnomemeeting? It's in woody, so it > > isn't > >> like there would be any problems meeting its dependancies. > >> > > But it is qu

Re: Netmeeting clone (not gnomemeeting)

2002-04-09 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Sridhar M.A. wrote: >> Might I ask why you don't just try gnomemeeting? It's in woody, so it > isn't >> like there would be any problems meeting its dependancies. >> > But it is quite old. The latest version is not there even in sid. The > version in woody is 0.12

Re: Netmeeting clone (not gnomemeeting)

2002-04-09 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:43:11AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:05:53PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > > I'm looking for a netmeeting clone that doesn't have the fourty-thousand > > dependancies that gnomemeeting does. Does this exist? > > Might I a

Re: Netmeeting clone (not gnomemeeting)

2002-04-09 Thread David Roundy
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:05:53PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > I'm looking for a netmeeting clone that doesn't have the fourty-thousand > dependancies that gnomemeeting does. Does this exist? Might I ask why you don't just try gnomemeeting? It's in woody, so it isn't like there would be

Re: Netmeeting and ipfw

1999-10-20 Thread Bradley Fehr
Hi Perjan I have video and audio going out of my private network but I was unable to get audio coming in. I've heard that netmeeting sends the IP address of the machine in the payload of the packet which in my case is a private IP address. If netmeeting on my machine runs as a server for my part

Re: netMeeting

1998-08-25 Thread Greg Vence
I'd have to guess NO. There are too many possible proprietary (non-free) interfaces. General API, Compression etc. Of couse you could write M$ and ask them when they're going to port it. :) You'd be much more likely to find a GNU project that is available on all your intereted platforms, instea

Re: Netmeeting via Linux

1998-05-05 Thread Paul Guidera
From: Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul Guidera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tuesday, 5 May 1998 18:43 Subject: Re: Netmeeting via Linux >You have to have a kernel compiled with IP Forwarding and Masquerading >enabled (the default for mos

Re: Netmeeting via Linux

1998-05-05 Thread Bill Leach
You have to have a kernel compiled with IP Forwarding and Masquerading enabled (the default for most kernels is _disabled_). Then configure ipfwadm (in /etc/init.d/netbase), see man 8 ipfwadm. On Tue, May 05, 1998 at 12:14:25PM +0800, Paul Guidera wrote: > Can anyone please point me in the right