Micheal Mukherji wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:43:28 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remember, though, that a ns is 1 billionth of a second, and so a
3GHz CPU will onll does 3 cycles in a ns. Unless you are coding
to the bare metal with a *minimal* OS, like DOS, you can't do
anythin
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 22:21 +0530, Micheal Mukherji wrote:
> That was nice programming...
> Thanks..
No problem. Hope it helps...
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:46:46 -0800, Eric Gaumer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > timer(START)
> > my timed code ...
> > timer(STOP)
> > timer(VALUE)
--
Eric
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 19:59 +0530, Micheal Mukherji wrote:
> Hello,
> Kindly excuse me for posting this on debian thread...I dont know
> whether it is apt or not, but as I am using Debian, I am posting
> this..
>
> Can somebody tell me how I can get time elapsed in nanoseconds
> (possibly a functi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:51:00 +0530, Micheal Mukherji
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a 1.4 GHz processor, I use JVMPI( an abbreviation for Java Virtual
> Machine Programming Interface). It has a method called
> GetThreadCPUTime(), which it claims gives thread execution time in
> nanoseconds. He doe
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:43:28 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember, though, that a ns is 1 billionth of a second, and so a
> 3GHz CPU will onll does 3 cycles in a ns. Unless you are coding
> to the bare metal with a *minimal* OS, like DOS, you can't do
> anything useful in 3 clo
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 19:59 +0530, Micheal Mukherji wrote:
> Hello,
> Kindly excuse me for posting this on debian thread...I dont know
> whether it is apt or not, but as I am using Debian, I am posting
> this..
>
> Can somebody tell me how I can get time elapsed in nanoseconds
> (possibly a functi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:59:18 +0530, Micheal Mukherji
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody tell me how I can get time elapsed in nanoseconds
> (possibly a function)?
> I have looked at the date command, but it is getting overflown with in
> a couple of seconds, so on a second probe I dont know
7 matches
Mail list logo