Hi Joost,
you wrote:
> But if you've got the .a file, cannot you make the .so file by:
>
> mkdir t
> cd t
> ar -x ../libbsd.a
> gcc -o libbsd.so.1.0.0 -shared -W,l-soname,libbsd.so.1 *.o
>
> (I may well be _very_ wrong, and please flame me if I am,
> but I just _think_ it would work, and it's ea
joost witteveen writes:
> > > The current implementation of postgres95 for Debian requires
> > > libbsd.so.1.0.0, but the libc5 package includes only libbsd.a.
> > > (How) can I make libbsd.so.1.0.0 from the .a file?
> > > (Sorry to be asking what I imagine is such a naive question.)
> >
> > I ha
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen)
> But if you've got the .a file, cannot you make the .so file by:
>
> mkdir t
> cd t
> ar -x ../libbsd.a
> gcc -o libbsd.so.1.0.0 -shared -W,l-soname,libbsd.so.1 *.o
>
> (I may well be _very_ wrong, and please flame me if I am,
> but I just _think_ it woul
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, joost witteveen wrote:
> But if you've got the .a file, cannot you make the .so file by:
>
> mkdir t
> cd t
> ar -x ../libbsd.a
> gcc -o libbsd.so.1.0.0 -shared -W,l-soname,libbsd.so.1 *.o
Unless the .o files were compiled with -fpic, you'd have an unsharable
shared lib - not
>
> On Mon, 2 Sep 1996, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> > The current implementation of postgres95 for Debian requires
> > libbsd.so.1.0.0, but the libc5 package includes only libbsd.a.
> > (How) can I make libbsd.so.1.0.0 from the .a file?
> > (Sorry to be asking what I imagine is such a naive quest
On Mon, 2 Sep 1996, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> The current implementation of postgres95 for Debian requires
> libbsd.so.1.0.0, but the libc5 package includes only libbsd.a.
> (How) can I make libbsd.so.1.0.0 from the .a file?
> (Sorry to be asking what I imagine is such a naive question.)
I have
6 matches
Mail list logo
