Re: ncftp versus ncftp2 -- Debian packages for woody

2004-12-28 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
From: Alex Malinovic ncftp2 is the old ncftp client which many people really liked to use in scripts (a la wget). ncftp (3.x+) is a rewrite which focuses on using ncftp as a client application, not an automated scripting tool. If you prefer a CLI ftp client to a GUI like I do, ncftp (3.x+) is

Re: ncftp versus ncftp2 -- Debian packages for woody

2004-12-27 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 19:17 -0600, Gayle Lee Fairless wrote: > I note that ncftp is perhaps ten times bigger than ncftp2 and is a > rewrite of it with ncurses being in it. And ncftp2 has no SOCKS in it. > (It's barefoot?) > > What is the difference between the two? Or rather, what d

Re: ncftp with ssh

2002-06-24 Thread G. L. `Griz' Inabnit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 24 June 2002 05:13 pm, behapy wrote: > Hi, all? > > I'd like to transfer files from M$windows to Unix-clone system through > ssh by ncftp. > Is it possible that I use ncftp with ssh on Windows? I know that there are > ssh solutions > for M$windows

Re: ncftp can't put file!

2002-02-16 Thread nate
> | put index.html: PORT failed. sounds like you may be runing behind some sort of NAT and it isn't doing ftp right. try putting the client in passive mode before uploading .. if that fails, try to ftp without doing NAT. nate

Re: ncftp in potato?

1999-09-27 Thread Bob Nielsen
The license for libncftp (part of the newer versions of ncftp) prevents it from being included in Debian. You can still get the source and self-compile. Bob On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 01:29:49PM +0200, Marcus Johansson wrote: > > Hi! > > Why is there no ncftp 3.0.0 (beta) in potato/unstable? >

Re: ncftp visual mode

1998-12-12 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 10:18:24AM +, Gossamer wrote: > in the Debian version I have (3.0.0). > Am I going nuts? No, just need to RTFM. IIRC it is explained that the visual mode was removed from ncftp 3.x. Personally, lftp is a much better client. It doesn't have visual mode, either,

Re: ncftp. Current boot disks

1996-12-09 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Ioannis Tambouras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The symbolic link ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/rex/disks-i386/current > is pointing at 1996-11-28/, instead of 1996-12-7/. I think that is > incorrect. Once the mirror is up to date it will point at 1996-12-8. Note that's 8, not 7. The 1996-12-7 disks w

Re: ncftp. Current boot disks

1996-12-09 Thread Christian Hudon
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Ioannis Tambouras wrote: > > I need clarification on two issues: [nsip] > > * I need to file a bug report for ncftp-2.4.2: the get -R command is not > excecuted, I only get the prompt for the next command. > Few days ago I was looking at a debian bug list. Now tha

Re: ncftp

1996-11-03 Thread Guy Maor
Marco Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm using ncftp 2.3.0-7, and it tells me > > REST command not implemented. > > whenever I try to reget a file. > What's the matter? The ftpd daemon you're connecting to doesn't support the restart command, so you can't reget files. :( restart marke

Re: ncftp

1996-11-02 Thread Ezio Manini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Marco Mariani wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm using ncftp 2.3.0-7, and it tells me > > REST command not implemented. > > whenever I try to reget a file. > What's the matter? Not all the servers implement the reget. Try another one ;) Bye, Ezio