Hi!
I think you know that 2.6 is not ready yet. Use a stable kernel.
Why? I always thought that even numbers are for stable kernels.
But, apart from that, your question indicates that the error is more
likely on the server's side?
Bye,
Kevin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Kevin Boergens wrote:
Hi!
I'm having trouble at a desktop PC running woody. It mounts /home via
NFS from a server running woody,too, but with a 2.6.1 homemade kernel.
I use the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel.
Unfortunately, NFS does not work properly.
Jan 31 18:40:01 pceva kernel: nfs_notify_change: reva
on Mon, Jun 17, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Juni 2002 01:36 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > > According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as
> > > arranging page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
> >
> > That doesn't convey much, but if you mean what I think
I've only use Mozilla a little on Debian, but for my
money, Opera out performs it easily. You might want
to try it. It's available in a deb file.
http://www.opera.com/
--- Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M.
> Self:
Hi Karsten,
Am Montag, 17. Juni 2002 01:36 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> > According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as
> > arranging page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
>
> That doesn't convey much, but if you mean what I think you mean,
> you're wrong.
In a drawing it's really helpful for a
on Mon, Jun 17, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > > [...]
> > > but I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
> >
> > Define "breaking page layout".
>
> According the meaning of css-capabiliti
Hi Karsten,
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2002 08:17 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> > [...]
> > but I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
>
> Define "breaking page layout".
According the meaning of css-capabilities I define it as arranging
page-elements pixel-by-pixel.
> My experience is that web
on Sat, Jun 15, 2002, Gerhard Gaussling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2002 08:49 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
>
> > What happens if you disable font sizing via a user CSS? Like I
> > do ;-)
> >
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Download/userContent.css
>
> That may stops mo
> That may stops mozilla from crashing x by rendering huge fonts, but
> I'm wondering if it breaks the page layout.
I think the latest mozilla from unstable fixed this problem with huge
fonts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hi Karsten
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2002 08:49 schrieb Karsten M. Self:
> What happens if you disable font sizing via a user CSS? Like I
> do ;-)
>
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Download/userContent.css
That may stops mozilla from crashing x by rendering huge fonts, but
I'm wondering if it
on Wed, Jun 12, 2002, Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
What happens if you disable font
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 00:33, Travis Crump wrote:
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 00:33, Travis Crump wrote:
> Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> > crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
> >
> > Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
> >
>
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> See http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/25689.html for a nasty X
> crashing (and possibly machine crashing) bug regarding huge fonts.
>
> Guess it's back to links/lynx/w3m or whatever for a little while.
>
already been fixed[I couldn't reproduce this]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, David Wright wrote:
> I think Bruce or some other god put together a posting which showed
> exactly what to do.
Here is that message:-
Quote.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 13 12:09:47 1998
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 97 16:45 PDT
From: Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debia
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 07:00:10PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> I think that answers all the points raised, except perhaps to say
> that it isn't in the spirit of unix/linux to prevent you (as root)
> from trashing the system if you really want to.
Of course. But all I did was pick purge in dselec
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 04:12:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > > I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> > > I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obli
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 04:12:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> > I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obliged.
>
> Aargh! you removed base? You might be in f
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Christopher Barry wrote:
> Yes, but it won't create past /dev/sd15. The last time I installed
> Debian I had put 16 partitions on my brand new 9.1GB SCSI disk and then
> found I only had sda devices numbered up to 15. I read the manpage for
> /dev/MAKEDEV and found it pretty u
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I just removed some of the old buzz/rex packages, base, timezone, bdflush.
> I did it in dselect, and apt quite happily obliged.
Aargh! you removed base? You might be in for some trouble. Try to
run dpkg -i base-files.deb before you reboot. That
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
[...]
> creating sd will create all the way up to sdp.
Yes, but it won't create past /dev/sd15. The last time I installed
Debian I had put 16 partitions on my brand new 9.1GB SCSI disk and then
found I only had sda devices numbered up to 15. I read the manpage for
/dev/M
21 matches
Mail list logo
