Re: nano and pine

2005-06-08 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 6/6/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:28:49PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Monday June 6 2005 6:04 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > > > > That's what you get for using packages from untrusted sources :-) > > > Email the UW developers and tell

Re: nano and pine

2005-06-08 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 6/6/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > Hello: > > > > I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which comes > > with pine - installed with pine without any trouble. But I just tried > > to upgrad

Re: nano and pine [SOLVED]

2005-06-07 Thread Jon Dowland
Patrick Wiseman wrote: So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install it, with the '--force-overwrite' option. That seems to have worked (until, of course, I upgrade pine, when I'll have to go through the whole thing again!). You could install one using just the tarball,

Re: nano and pine [SOLVED]

2005-06-07 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:31:28AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > On 6/6/05, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Um, thanks guys, but none of this helps me get nano installed with pine. > > So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install > it, with the '--force-overwrite' op

Re: nano and pine [SOLVED]

2005-06-07 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 6/6/05, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, thanks guys, but none of this helps me get nano installed with pine. So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install it, with the '--force-overwrite' option. That seems to have worked (until, of course, I upgrade pine, when I'll

Re: nano and pine

2005-06-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:28:49PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Monday June 6 2005 6:04 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > > That's what you get for using packages from untrusted sources :-) > > Email the UW developers and tell them to read up on diversions. > > They will *not* react kindly to

Re: nano and pine

2005-06-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Monday June 6 2005 6:04 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > Hello: > > > > I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which > > comes with pine - installed with pine without any trouble. But I > > just tried to upgrad

Re: nano and pine

2005-06-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > Hello: > > I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which comes > with pine - installed with pine without any trouble. But I just tried > to upgrade to pine 4.63, using the .deb file from washington.edu, and > it ba