Re: mutt v. elm: reply-to-list

Stephen Patterson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > At least if you hit L (IIRC, been a long time since I've used mutt), > > it automatically understands that you're replying to the mailing list > > itself. > > Though you do have to set the subscribe variable so that mutt recognises > the email add

Re: mutt v. elm: reply-to-list

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:10:05 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > At least if you hit L (IIRC, been a long time since I've used mutt), > it automatically understands that you're replying to the mailing list > itself. Though you do have to set the subscribe variable so that mutt recognises the email addre