Hi!
Mike Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:33:00AM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
> > I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have
> > just been leaving mail in the mail spoon. Mutt
> > has a habit of trashing that file.
> Check +mbox. The default behaviour o
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:33:00AM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
> I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again
> after some version changes.
>
> I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in
> the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashi
hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Alan Eugene Davis, Stardate 270199.0833:
> I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again
> after some version changes.
>
> I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in
> the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashing tha
Alan Eugene Davis dixit:
> I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again
> after some version changes.
>
> I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in
> the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashing that file.
>
> Can anybody corrobora
Quoting Leon Breedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Nov 04 1998, David Wright spake thus:
>
> > Takes up 1.6MB though :(
> try 'strip' on the executable, or turning off the '-g' option
> to your compiler in the Makefile. my mutt executable is only
> +/-400KB.
Thanks. I'll do that to procmail too!
On Wed, Nov 04 1998, David Wright spake thus:
> Takes up 1.6MB though :(
try 'strip' on the executable, or turning off the '-g' option
to your compiler in the Makefile. my mutt executable is only
+/-400KB.
regards,
leon
--
__ _
Leon Breedt-o)
Quoting Alan Eugene Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I upgraded mutt to v 0.93.2-1. Now all mail that has been read is deleted
> from my inbox.
>
> Is there a configuration issue?
It may depend where you're coming from. I new in from pine, and built my
.muttrc from "Sven's". It mentions that "hold
7 matches
Mail list logo
