Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:06:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> I've always wondered about the possibilities of setting up more than one
>> desktop on a single system. And by more than one desktop, I mean full
>> KVM, audio, and USB (preferably w
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:06:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I've always wondered about the possibilities of setting up more than one
> desktop on a single system. And by more than one desktop, I mean full KVM,
> audio, and USB (preferably with the ability to tell which
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:06:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> > Indeed. In 5 years I'll have the same 4-core desktop but with 3 PCIe
> > videocards connected to 3 LCD monitors supporting a 3-seater and I'll
> > have discovered a laptop to do the same. Great future.
>
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Indeed. In 5 years I'll have the same 4-core desktop but with 3 PCIe
> videocards connected to 3 LCD monitors supporting a 3-seater and I'll
> have discovered a laptop to do the same. Great future.
I've always wondered about the possibilities of setting up more than one
d
Am 2007-02-16 18:51:25, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
> Granted, the cooling issues would be interesting.
There are special CPU's with 64bit running with 300 MHz
and have not more then 35°C... Space-Technologie!
Maybe running a 256Bit 256-Core with 256-Threads/Core CPU on 100 MHz.
:-)
Greetings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/07 08:43, ?ukasz Andrzejak wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/16/07 17:16, pinniped wrote:
[snip]
> You might have been happy with a simple console 10 years ago,
Console? You mean "terminal"?
[snip]
> software anymore. Most people don't - they don't need
> On 02/16/07 17:16, pinniped wrote:
>> 'Multicore' processors are pretty new - older machines have always had
>> an enormous number of processors. 80 cores on a single chip would take
>
> With "enormous" always changing. Relative to the number of 2x SMP
> systems, very few systems have 8 CPUs,
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/07 17:16, pinniped wrote:
'Multicore' processors are pretty new - older machines have always had
an enormous number of processors. 80 cores on a single chip would take
With "enormous" always changing. Relative to the n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/07 17:16, pinniped wrote:
>
> 'Multicore' processors are pretty new - older machines have always had
> an enormous number of processors. 80 cores on a single chip would take
With "enormous" always changing. Relative to the number of 2x SMP
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:16:58AM +0100, pinniped wrote:
>
> 'Multicore' processors are pretty new - older machines have always had an
> enormous number of processors. 80 cores on a single chip would take up most
> of the silicon wafer. (and will probably have a few defective cores and
> rathe
10 matches
Mail list logo
